 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Aleck79
Re: regarding that picture "Uverse Voice is more reliable" I also find that a bit crazy.
$15/month MORE than their Call Vantage VoIP to do:
1. Put it on a tunnel on Uverse service (technically, it should be CHEAPER), as I HAVE to bundle it.
2. Uverse is already on AT&T's network, how much more of a dedicated line am I going to get ?
3. I could purchase a cheap UPS for battery backup.
4. POTS is the same price as Uverse VoIP, and I don't have to bundle, and I don't have to pay for electricity to run the phone service (Uverse RG).
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | Well I think is more about what a feature is worth, not what a feature costs. They are going to be only the provider at this point that you can your wireless and wired voicemail in one mailbox and on your tv as well. This price also matches what the cable companies are charging for their voice services. |
