RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to Matt
Re: Kudos! That's not the ATT DSL (sbcglobal.net) TOS. Try again.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
|
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by RadioDoc:That's not the ATT DSL (sbcglobal.net) TOS. Try again. So AT&T Worldnet DSL and AT&T DSL via SBC Global are two separate entities? |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Yup. ATT Worldnet is the dialup ISP they ran before being eaten by the cowboys in Texas. They had DSL in some markets but not very much.
The current ATT DSL TOS states: "[S]ervice is intended for use with a single computer or a network of computer/servers."
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by RadioDoc:Yup. ATT Worldnet is the dialup ISP they ran before being eaten by the cowboys in Texas. They had DSL in some markets but not very much. The current ATT DSL TOS states: "[S]ervice is intended for use with a single computer or a network of computer/servers." I wonder what they thought people would use their DSL line for, if not a single or network of computers? Ha. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | That's just an excerpt from a longer section, but yeah. It is language which used to be used to distinguish between business and personal use but the distinction was erased years ago. The wording is still there though, and you can bet the lawyers get paid by the word... 
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
| reply to RadioDoc
they also still offer DSL but with COVAD. |
|
