Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U-Verse 10Mbps: February 1 » Cool!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Where is the value? »
« Multiple HD Streams  
AuthorAll Replies


bogey

@ameritech.net
reply to ztmike
Re: Cool!

Pretty much the same? You mean they increased it by 50% (or 150% of previous max..pota-to/potah-to) and that's still not good enough?


factchecker

@cox.net
After all the overhead, you go from being able to upload at around 880-900kbps to around 1200-1250kbps... Not that big of a difference.

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

said by factchecker :

After all the overhead, you go from being able to upload at around 880-900kbps to around 1200-1250kbps... Not that big of a difference.
Not that big of a difference? Seems big to me. For example, I have AT&T DSL Elite at 768k rated, and I peak at about 560Kbits actual data speed. That's 70Kbytes/sec. So a 20 megabyte upload takes 285 seconds or 4 3/4 minutes. If I could double my upload speed to 1.5M rated, presumably I'd halve my upload time to about 2 1/2 minutes.

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Covington, LA

reply to factchecker
So if speed is 1Mb/s and the increase in speed is to 1.5Mb/s then the ratio of 50% increase will filter on through to the new speed.

Or in other words the increase speed suffers the same overhead increase and the changes in actual speed change directly proportional. They boost the set speed by 50% and the actual speed will be boosted by 50%.


factchecker

@cox.net
In theory, yes, those numbers work out. However, once one works out the effects of overhead, the change in effective throughput is hardly significant.


factchecker

@cox.net

reply to MyDogHsFleas
said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

Not that big of a difference? Seems big to me.
Objectively speaking, based entirely on the numbers, not all that big.

Subjectively speaking, based on user perceptions, it might be big.


veloslave
Geek For God
Premium
join:2003-07-11
Pleasant Hill, CA
Based on you have 25 to start with... and then big brother tells you how much of and when/where you can use it.........

Same old pachell
--
Mom was right.... I NEED fiber!

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Covington, LA
reply to factchecker
So in theory 1200kb/s is no more than 800kb/s. So why bother ever increasing speed?

Wanna rethink that?
Forums » U-Verse 10Mbps: February 1Where is the value? »
« Multiple HD Streams  


Friday, 21-Nov 04:08:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [102] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [79] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [78] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [67] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [66] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
· [49] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [48] Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Pacific Northwest In December
· [44] Comcast Offers 'Bare Bones' 768kbps VoIP Double Play
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· Rocky - time to offer VPN service to all your customers [TekSavvy]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Big Oil should bail out the Big 3, not us! [General Questions]
· Service problems at multiple VoIP providers today? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Official news from TekSavvy regarding the CRTC descision [TekSavvy]
· [iPhone] 2.2 out now [All things Macintosh]
· Very close to switching to Teksavvy but doubts [TekSavvy]
· [ PvE] Leatherworking [World of Warcraft]
· Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling [TekSavvy]