republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U-Verse 10Mbps: February 1 » Cool!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Where is the value? »
« Multiple HD Streams  
AuthorAll Replies


bogey

@mycingular.net
reply to ztmike
Re: Cool!

Pretty much the same? You mean they increased it by 50% (or 150% of previous max..pota-to/potah-to) and that's still not good enough?


factchecker

@cox.net
After all the overhead, you go from being able to upload at around 880-900kbps to around 1200-1250kbps... Not that big of a difference.

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

said by factchecker :

After all the overhead, you go from being able to upload at around 880-900kbps to around 1200-1250kbps... Not that big of a difference.
Not that big of a difference? Seems big to me. For example, I have AT&T DSL Elite at 768k rated, and I peak at about 560Kbits actual data speed. That's 70Kbytes/sec. So a 20 megabyte upload takes 285 seconds or 4 3/4 minutes. If I could double my upload speed to 1.5M rated, presumably I'd halve my upload time to about 2 1/2 minutes.

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here

reply to factchecker
So if speed is 1Mb/s and the increase in speed is to 1.5Mb/s then the ratio of 50% increase will filter on through to the new speed.

Or in other words the increase speed suffers the same overhead increase and the changes in actual speed change directly proportional. They boost the set speed by 50% and the actual speed will be boosted by 50%.


factchecker

@cox.net
In theory, yes, those numbers work out. However, once one works out the effects of overhead, the change in effective throughput is hardly significant.


factchecker

@cox.net

reply to MyDogHsFleas
said by MyDogHsFleas See Profile :

Not that big of a difference? Seems big to me.
Objectively speaking, based entirely on the numbers, not all that big.

Subjectively speaking, based on user perceptions, it might be big.


veloslave
Geek For God
Premium
join:2003-07-11
Pleasant Hill, CA
Based on you have 25 to start with... and then big brother tells you how much of and when/where you can use it.........

Same old pachell
--
Mom was right.... I NEED fiber!

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
reply to factchecker
So in theory 1200kb/s is no more than 800kb/s. So why bother ever increasing speed?

Wanna rethink that?
Forums » U-Verse 10Mbps: February 1Where is the value? »
« Multiple HD Streams  


Sunday, 08-Nov 17:59:21 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· Why do they traumatize kids in Phys. Ed. in school? [Canadian Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]
· Please Help, I think my computer is being monitored [Security]