<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re:  AT&#x26;T looking at Internet filtering in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19863935</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:15:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:15:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re:  AT&#x26;T looking at Internet filtering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19863935</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/844460"><b>HenryNettles</b></A> : Which, of course, explains why UseNet providers now offer SSL encryption.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19863935</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:31:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  AT&#x26;T looking at Internet filtering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19863577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1140294"><b>Blackbird</b></A> : It's hard to follow Stephenson's reasoning here. If AT&T "is still evaluating" whether to examine traffic, that would imply they're not already examining. In which case, Stephenson's analogy about being in a store and watching DVD theft fails... because if they're not examining the traffic, they have no way to know a particular "someone" is stealing anything. A better AT&T analogy would be: it's like being blind and in a store, and thinking DVD theft will occur sometimes - but with nothing witnessed, you have no reason or justification to 'act'.<br><br>One can but wonder if AT&T's reasoning is similar regarding 'examining' phone traffic, since all manner of illegal planning and activities involve phone conversations.<br><small>--<br>If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19863577</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:21:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title> AT&#x26;T looking at Internet filtering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19859060</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/459257"><b>KamMan</b></A> : Came across this article and thought it was worth sharing or a discussion....<br><br>DAVOS, Switzerland - AT&T Inc. is still evaluating whether to examine traffic on its Internet lines to stop illegal sharing of copyright material, its chief executive said Wednesday.<br><br>CEO Randall Stephenson told a conference at the World Economic Forum that the company is looking at monitoring peer-to-peer file-sharing networks, one of the largest drivers of online traffic but also a common way to illegally exchange copyright files. <br><br>"It's like being in a store and watching someone steal a DVD. Do you act?" Stephenson asked.<br><br>AT&T has talked about such plans since last summer. They represent a break with the current practice of U.S. Internet service providers, who are shielded by law from liability if their subscribers trade copyright files like movies.<br><br>Link to full article:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080123/ap_on_hi_te/world_forum_at_t" >news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080123/ap_&middot;&middot;&middot;rum_at_t</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19859060</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:51:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
