Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cable Industry Takes Aim At FCC Exclusivity Order » Civil Rights
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
...hmmm »
« Law trumps Contracts  
AuthorAll Replies

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest

reply to TraumaJunkie
Re: Civil Rights

said by TraumaJunkie See Profile :

I decide who come on my property and runs wiring into my buildings. Simple.
And I hope you also fully disclose the intentionally limited choices your tenants have prior to lease signing. Even simpler.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20


1 edit
Why should he? You're seriously midguided there.. he, as a landowner, only has to provide the basic services as required by law, and guess what? Cable is not one of them!

Phone, Power, a form of heat, (be it gas or electric) sewer, water, and trash are the only "required services"... cable TV and internet are not one of them NOR do they need to be "fully disclosed" as you put it.

With your post, you've overstepped your boundaries. Would it be nice they were disclosed? sure.. required? no. There are a lot of things that could/should be 'fully disclosed' but to what point should a landlord have to go?

It's already assumed that as a renter there are going to be choices that can be limited. If it's important to the renter, they should ask,... daddy.

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest

We're talking a "utility" access to which is regulated by the Federal government as well as state and local franchising laws. There are equal-access laws on the books and a landlord cannot lock someone into a lease without disclosing things like restrictions on cable TV vendors.

At some point I trust you will back up your opinion with something resembling facts. Lease law is probably a good place for you to start.

I happen to be a rental property owner and landlord. I have both commercial and residential property in two states. You?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.
Forums » Cable Industry Takes Aim At FCC Exclusivity Order...hmmm »
« Law trumps Contracts  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 05:16:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [50] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]