<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Range in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19874683</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:10:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:10:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19874683</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I _really_ don't think anyone's using omnidirectional for data communications.  Its a waste of spectrum.<br>The main reason for trimming to a few miles vs. ~30miles is capacity.  How many users can use WiMAX in any given area can use it, if you're going to spread a 70MHz beam over 30 miles, even in one sector.   Backhauling is different direct point-to-point, with a narrow area would obviously give a much longer range.<br> </div>Poor choice of words on my part. The 30 miles is for point-to-point is what I was getting at.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19874683</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:50:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19874590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I _really_ don't think anyone's using omnidirectional for data communications.  Its a waste of spectrum.<br>The main reason for trimming to a few miles vs. ~30miles is capacity.  How many users can use WiMAX in any given area can use it, if you're going to spread a 70MHz beam over 30 miles, even in one sector.   Backhauling is different direct point-to-point, with a narrow area would obviously give a much longer range.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19874590</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:30:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19873788</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  gaforces <A HREF="/useremail/u/612876"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I'm a little disappointed in the range of the service from the towers, it's not even close to the 30 miles that was reported.<br>The hype hasn't matched the technology, so far.<br> </div>That's point-to-point using directional antennas.<br><br>Omnidirectional service is closer to a few mile radius.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19873788</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:34:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19873382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/612876"><b>gaforces</b></A> : I'm a little disappointed in the range of the service from the towers, it's not even close to the 30 miles that was reported.<br>The hype hasn't matched the technology, so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19873382</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
