republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Mouseprint Arbitration Pushes Continue To Fail » Nasty
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
« Nasty  
AuthorAll Replies

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo

reply to en102
Re: Nasty

You forgot about EBITDA which is often more spoken about on conference calls. That's the real driver in the telco/cableco space these days.

said by en102 See Profile :

Corporations are looking out for:

a) bottom line (profits)
b) corporate assets (name)
c) stock price (upper management's pay is tied to stock)

Corporations do not care about people, and in general, even their staff, if it affects any of the above items.
That doesn't make sense. Corporate goals vary by their business, their position within it, and their ownership.

Your statement about people doesn't make sense either, to me at least. Best talent recruiting corps will care about people until it is a position where it believes it can get the best for less in return for perceived security, if that corp is willing to emphasize profitability. Stock price valuation on the other hand is way beyond a single post discussion, but I would agree, at times Corps will care less about their people and customers in the proper circumstances (which are generally anti-consumer). Private businesses are no better (think the shady mechanic in a big city...)

said by en102 See Profile :

Don't forget, there's a flip side, where many consumers attempt to take advantage of large corporations as well. Other corp will attempt to erode 'a' and 'c', and activists will attempt to smear 'b'.
A consumer taking advantage of a corporation is a david and goliath story. Has a large corporation ever been bankrupted by it's customers? More likely, large corporations have failed due to hubris and incorrect motivations like your C example. Paying the CEO on stock price at any cost is akin to paying the salesperson a commission regardless of the profitability (or loss) of a sale. Sometimes the best laid plans aren't right In either case, the CEO/Salesperson still comes out ahead in every instance...would it be possible if there wasn't such a high level of nepotism without corresponding government oversight (if the gov themselves could be freed from the same problems?).

Perhaps I'm just an old jaded MF.
Thread is
Forums » Mouseprint Arbitration Pushes Continue To Fail« Nasty  


Saturday, 28-Nov 18:10:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [64] Weekend Open Thread
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Opera 10.10 keeps opening ICF ports - security issue? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· how to use the 2nd line with phone hooked to the 1st line? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Confused about availability... [AT&T U-verse]
· Why would I want an e reader? [General Questions]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]