republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Mouseprint Arbitration Pushes Continue To Fail » Nasty
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
« Nasty  
AuthorAll Replies

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to en102
Re: Nasty

You forgot about EBITDA which is often more spoken about on conference calls. That's the real driver in the telco/cableco space these days.

said by en102 See Profile :

Corporations are looking out for:

a) bottom line (profits)
b) corporate assets (name)
c) stock price (upper management's pay is tied to stock)

Corporations do not care about people, and in general, even their staff, if it affects any of the above items.
That doesn't make sense. Corporate goals vary by their business, their position within it, and their ownership.

Your statement about people doesn't make sense either, to me at least. Best talent recruiting corps will care about people until it is a position where it believes it can get the best for less in return for perceived security, if that corp is willing to emphasize profitability. Stock price valuation on the other hand is way beyond a single post discussion, but I would agree, at times Corps will care less about their people and customers in the proper circumstances (which are generally anti-consumer). Private businesses are no better (think the shady mechanic in a big city...)

said by en102 See Profile :

Don't forget, there's a flip side, where many consumers attempt to take advantage of large corporations as well. Other corp will attempt to erode 'a' and 'c', and activists will attempt to smear 'b'.
A consumer taking advantage of a corporation is a david and goliath story. Has a large corporation ever been bankrupted by it's customers? More likely, large corporations have failed due to hubris and incorrect motivations like your C example. Paying the CEO on stock price at any cost is akin to paying the salesperson a commission regardless of the profitability (or loss) of a sale. Sometimes the best laid plans aren't right In either case, the CEO/Salesperson still comes out ahead in every instance...would it be possible if there wasn't such a high level of nepotism without corresponding government oversight (if the gov themselves could be freed from the same problems?).

Perhaps I'm just an old jaded MF.
Thread is
-
Forums » Mouseprint Arbitration Pushes Continue To Fail« Nasty  


Thursday, 21-Aug 17:56:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [100] Was FiOS a Good Idea?
· [87] New Comcast Throttling System = 'A Really Good DSL Experience'
· [77] Landscaping, Courtesy of AT&T?
· [76] ISPs Whine About Network Neutrality 'Paranoia'
· [76] FCC Finally Issues Comcast Throttling Order
· [57] Craig Moffett: Network Upgrades Are For Ninnies
· [56] Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
· [56] Did Apple iPhone Fix Make Problems Worse?
· [55] AT&T Cooking Up New VoIP Product
· [52] Qwest, Unions Strike Deal
Most people now reading
· [Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols [Comcast HSI]
· How-to: make ActionTec MI424-WR a network bridge [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· [iPhone] 2.0.2 firmware is out, Please post outcome [All things Macintosh]
· Opinion on CPE [Wireless Service Providers]
· [Connectivity] Sandvine kills more than just P2P [Comcast HSI]
· Porch light bulbs [Home Repair & Improvement]
· How I Stole Someone's Identity [Security]
· Outage [ViaTalk]
· WPA TKIP or AES? [Wireless Security]