Uverse Max in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19888067 en Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:58:11 EDT Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:58:11 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19908676 anon : 3000 feet max is the distance limit]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19908676 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:43:44 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19889616 RadioDoc : The availability checker is up and running, but they are just starting to light up the Chicagoland area so the "yes" responses are quite limited at the moment. None of my numbers qualify yet, but I knew that already since the equipment I've seen around here is not operational yet.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19889616 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:13:06 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19889609 RadioDoc :
said by ossito16 See Profile :

I don't see Harvey getting this at all. Most of the southern suburbs of Chicago are old and have very old telephone copper. Which means high signal-to-noise ratios. I lived in Harvey and it was a nightmare to get idsl let alone some super speed trick vdsl. Until At&t solves the distance problem this is not going to take off at all and Comcast will maintain its death grip on Chicago and surrounding areas
The "distance problem" is "solved" by placing the equipment within 5000 feet of the customers. That's the whole point of it. The age of your copper is not the issue...although the maintenance (or lack thereof) certainly plays a role over time. I would guess that most of Harvey is newer than most of La Grange.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19889609 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:11:34 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888922 koolkid1563 : To add to that, if you can get U-verse at all (as in installed), you can get any internet and TV package you want.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888922 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:31:22 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888641 anon : Oddly enough there is one I think is in Robins, it could be blue island but it rights near Robins.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888641 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:48:14 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888620 ossito16 : I don't see Harvey getting this at all. Most of the southern suburbs of Chicago are old and have very old telephone copper. Which means high signal-to-noise ratios. I lived in Harvey and it was a nightmare to get idsl let alone some super speed trick vdsl. Until At&t solves the distance problem this is not going to take off at all and Comcast will maintain its death grip on Chicago and surrounding areas]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888620 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:36:47 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888496 anon : Hey Doc, do you know if the avaliability checker is update on the site? I can't find address that are avaliable but I know where boxes are and NONE of the addresses by them are?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888496 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:15:23 EDT Re: Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888389 RadioDoc : If you can get it at all you'll be able to get "full speed" on the broadband Internet part.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888389 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:56:27 EDT Uverse Max http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888067 OSUGoose : I have to sat 10/1.5 isent that bad, just wonder what the distance limit will be on it. Looks like maybe at&t is gonna start delivering, after being thrashed on so much for what they've dont thus far.

P.S. Cue comcast rick in 5.......4......3.......2......1.....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19888067 Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:02:36 EDT