myokitis
join:2004-06-19
Alexandria, VA
| Additional Plant Req'd The attached links seem to indicate that RTs will be req'd for this, so it will take a significant effort to deploy this in the wild. This might be appealing to someone like Quest, who has no other next-gen plant improvements planned, and maybe some smaller ILECs. However, I don't see the bigger ILECs being able to use this.
Does anyone know if this is supposed to work over single pairs, or is bonding necessary? | |
|
 
Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC | Re: Additional Plant Req'd If Bell can sprinkle ADSL2+ remote DSLAMs everywhere, why not? | |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here | Everything needs RTs. It's the reason why Mesa cabinets have been in huge demand for a decade or so.
This will probably never fly for the telcos as they've already made their decision and the incremental increase may not justify it. | |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY | Also remember CLECs dont do RTs. So the only hope of this ever being installed anywhere is the ILEC, and if they haven't done ADSL2 by now, they sure wont do this. | |
|
eeMcCloud
@sbcglobal.net | They do not bond. This specification is single pair. Ot is significant when AT&Ts u-verse is only offered to 3000ft. | |
|
|
|
|
