<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Double edge in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19902019</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:24:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:24:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Double edge</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19902019</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Comcast could sue you either way since that would be for totally different things like failure to pay (or their failure to credit you properly), etc.  The arbitration clauses almost always are written heavily against the customer.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19902019</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:35:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Double edge</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19901946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : Does this mean that if a customer opts out of arbitration Comcast can now sue them in court?  They can find reasons, I am sure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19901946</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:22:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
