karlmarx
join:2006-09-18
Nashua, NH
 ·Fairpoint Communic..
| reply to Rick
Re: Personally..
How can you possible use the phrase 'not taking sides' when the aribitrator is paid for by the megacorps. Look at it this way, if any company found AGAINST a megacorp, they would lose their contract. Ergo, the arbitrators will ALWAYS side with the megacorp, because the megacorp pays their bill!
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! |
|
druber
join:2000-04-11
Marlborough, MA | sheesh, that's exactly what he said! he was saying that arbitration is not fundamentally bad, it's how the company has it done. |
|
moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
edit:
January 30th, @12:59PM
| said by druber  :sheesh, that's exactly what he said! he was saying that arbitration is not fundamentally bad, it's how the company has it done. And that is the problem. Arbitration has become nothing more than a legal way of buying off the judge.
If Comcast hired an arbitration company and found a majority of the cases against them, you would see that company losing the contract and Comcast can shop around for a judge who will know which hand feeds it. |
|
