site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
866
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


JE
JE 's BACK BABY
Premium
join:2000-12-15
East Orange, NJ

1 edit

OH YEAH!

I hope these people win because it would set an Industry standard, and maybe this will be the beginning of the end of ETF's for cellular providers, or @ least a set minimum of maybe $50.00 LOL

JE


brooklynman4

join:2004-09-07
Brooklyn, NY

Well if its building for 4 years i guess they have there money ready to settle just like big companies.



fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to JE

said by JE:

I hope these people win because it would set an Industry standard, and maybe this will be the beginning of the end of ETF's for cellular providers, or @ least a set minimum of maybe $50.00 LOL

JE
The std practice has already changed with the ETFs reducing over the length of the contract,

In 2006, Verizon took steps to soften the blow of early termination fees by implementing a proration plan for ETFs. The plan takes money off the total fee for each month of your contract you serve, so you are not hit with a full fee for terminating late in your contract. Competitors T-Mobile USA Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp. and AT&T Mobility also announced similar proration schemes.

--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by fAcEtIOUs:

The std practice has already changed with the ETFs reducing over the length of the contract,
Since when has rationality ever factored into how lawyers do things?
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


BabyBear
Keep wise ...with Nite-Owl

join:2007-01-11

said by pnh102:

Since when has rationality ever factored into how lawyers do things?
Or contracts written completely by one side with no input from the other.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by BabyBear:

Or contracts written completely by one side with no input from the other.
Last I checked nobody holds a gun to one's head to agree to any cell phone contract. You can get cellular service without a contract if you like. Pay for the phone or go with prepaid service and you have no contract at all to deal with.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA

Without knowing what the actual complaint is, I think you're jumping the gun. Is it that the ETF is there at all? Or is that they were charged the ETF even though the contract was materially changed before hand.


lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness

join:2001-12-24
Canada

reply to JE

said by JE:

I hope these people win because it would set an Industry standard, and maybe this will be the beginning of the end of ETF's for cellular providers, or @ least a set minimum of maybe $50.00 LOL

JE
They'll be forced to switch to the model being used in Asia.

Cell phones will bee purchased at full price, and monthly fees will be low. Either way, the providers make money because they'll then sell you the phones will a high mark up.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake?


Fed_Up

@rr.com

reply to pnh102
Part of the problem is that the cell-phone carriers can arbitraily change the terms of the contract without notice....if you call to make a small change to your calling plan, they can extend your contract for another 2 years from the date of that minor plan change. So, if you make a change 3 months before your contract end-date, they now extend the plan for an additional 2 years. YOU NEVER WIN!


Wednesday, 30-May 00:57:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics