<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Never trust at&#x26;t in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19910125</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:13:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:13:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Never trust at&#x26;t</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19910125</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/550826"><b>Alphy</b></A> : Open access is an illusion. <br><br>at&t must be thinking; "Sure, we'll let any device on our network. We're also going to prioritize the traffic of the handsets we find most to our liking (the ones that sell $2.99 ringtones)"<br><br>Google MUST win this auction. Simply relying on the carriers to give fair open access (seriously, you have to be kidding yourself if you think at&t would really do this for the consumer) would be a mistake. So long as carriers own the pipes and the airways, they will, in the long run, determine what type of traffic will go on their network. (Please Google at&t and bittorrent) <br><br>Please Google, win this spectrum auction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19910125</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:01:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
