<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1 in Linksys</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19913168</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:48:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:48:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20449910</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1545490"><b>SA Spurs1</b></A> : The WRT54G2 has 240mhz proc., 8 mb ram, and 2 mb flash. So I doubt you will be able to put dd-wrt on it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20449910</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:57:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20446900</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/804724"><b>b62141</b></A> : Great router. I would urge anyone to use the G bandwidth router instead of buying the more expensive N router simply because N routers often cause signal loses and often the router will begin dropping from 54Mbps down to zero.<br><br>One can use this router until N bandwidth of 100 Mbps is established, then upgrade to a Linksys WRT300N Wireless N Router.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20446900</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:25:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20084512</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1515854"><b>darthboy</b></A> : calling it fugly would be an understatement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20084512</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:14:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20081364</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/220044"><b>Raphion</b></A> : That design just <b>screams</b> "PoS" to me...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20081364</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:02:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964718</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>punker</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  noping <A HREF="/useremail/u/1429543"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Isn't that a WRT55AG?<br><br>The WRT54G2 v1 is almost as ugly as Netgear's redesigned products (not the purple box-like products of yesteryear).<br> </div>nope <br><br>it's WRT51AB 32MB RAM 4 Flash(very hard to find)  but i am hopeing to install an b/g card (it has Dual mini PCI slots)  and installing DD-WRT via Jtag<br><br>it should work with DD-wrt  it's all Broadcom  Besides the A card<br><br>but they do have an WRT55AG (it's an wrt54g with A support)<br><small>--<br>&#937;?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964718</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:18:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964548</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1086545"><b>procto</b></A> : The chipset is intel IXP422 which is 266 Mghz.<br><br>  The WRT160N router uses the same chipset and has 32 Ram as well.<br><br>  What the difference between the WRT54G2 v1 and WRT160N routers from Linksys the advanced wireless on the 160N other than than that look the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964548</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:49:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641674"><b>decx</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  noping <A HREF="/useremail/u/1429543"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Isn't that a WRT55AG?<br><br>The WRT54G2 v1 is almost as ugly as Netgear's redesigned products (not the purple box-like products of yesteryear).<br> </div>Netgear's recent stuff doesn't look bad (IMO better than the 54G2), but it's no where near as good as the old blue metal box style they used in the 90's and early 2000's (like the amazing RT314).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964532</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:46:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964257</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297232"><b>lmacmil</b></A> : I noticed last week that all the big box stores dropped the price of the WRT54G by $5 (to $45).  Do you suppose they will phase it out soon?  What about the GL version?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19964257</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:48:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963278</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1429543"><b>noping</b></A> : Isn't that a WRT55AG?<br><br>The WRT54G2 v1 is almost as ugly as Netgear's redesigned products (not the purple box-like products of yesteryear).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963278</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:26:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963024</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1143582"><b>Thane_Bitter</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  punker <A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>i like these :D<br><br>i have like 9 of them :D<br> </div>Punker, the second one from the bottom, (appears to be A & B/G capable) what is the model number?<br><small>--<br>download speed : 506.4 KB/sec.<br>upload speed : 83.6 KB/sec</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963024</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:36:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19959160</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641674"><b>decx</b></A> : No it's not, By the name the WRT54G2 is 802.11g only while the 160N is a 2.4GHz Draft N router<br><br>It looks like Linksys is replacing the blue Linky casing they've used for the last few years with the internal antenna black glob of plastic case we're talking about.  In addition of the 54G2 and the 160N, the 310N is also in the same form factor.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19959160</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:38:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19957116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1086545"><b>procto</b></A> : Is this the same router as the new WRT160N router it looks exactly like it?<br><br>   the 130N version lookwise is different<br><br>        regards  procto]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19957116</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:34:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19955781</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>punker</b></A> : i like these :D<br><br>i have like 9 of them :D<br><small>--<br>&#937;?</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/19955781?c=1272448&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxOTkxMzE2OC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="1057133 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1272448.thumb600~ea63b92f42c18fa531e8e9103c3d57f7/S4024326.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19955781</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:14:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19954309</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1172979"><b>Wolfie00</b></A> : I agree that the design sucks.  Linksys no doubt thinks it looks "sleek", but the WRT54G looked like a no-nonsense practical design similar to professional products -- I have it on a cabinet shelf along with my cable modem and some other stuff and it looks cool.  The new design just shrieks "consumer junk!", even if the unit technically might be quite good.  Although the hidden, non-replaceable antenna does not bode well.  Not impressed!<br><small>--<br>"Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain"  -- Friedrich Schiller<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19954309</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19951339</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : What an ugly design. To be honest, if someone gave me that Linksys router and told me it was the very very first version of their WRT54G, I'd believe them!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19951339</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:16:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19949172</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641674"><b>decx</b></A> : Yeah usually it's the trade off between replaceable antenna sleek looks.  This one has neither.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19949172</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19949091</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/586245"><b>bshelly</b></A> : I miss the external antennas.  I am not a fan of internal antennas as I have no control over the signal or the ability to add external antennas.  It's kind of ugly too, but maybe I'm the only one that feels that way.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19949091</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:32:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19945964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>punker</b></A> : 240MHz(more likely) to 260MHz<br><small>--<br>&#937;?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19945964</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:45:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19945952</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1086545"><b>procto</b></A> : how fast is the processor on this and  suppose it has 32mb of ram also.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19945952</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:41:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913698</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>punker</b></A> : i highly doubt that dd-wrt can be put on it because there is no j-tag   just hope they put one<br><small>--<br>Send Spam Here:  my.spamming.box@gmail.com<br>59346 Messages  as of Jan 10</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913698</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:24:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641674"><b>decx</b></A> : Nice.  I see somebody's taking hints from Apple's AEBS and the old Orinoco in trying to hide the antenna.  Let's hope Linksys take on that doesn't impair range too much.<br><br>And since it's Broadcom base it'll probably be gotten to work with DD-WRT pretty quickly, though it'll most definitly be the neutered version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913481</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:04:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913477</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641674"><b>decx</b></A> : Sorry double post.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913477</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:03:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>New Linksys MODEL WRT54G2 v1</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>punker</b></A> : <br> :D pic's for you enjoyment<br><br>&raquo;<small>https</small>://<A HREF="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=326977&fcc_id=">fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo&middot;&middot;&middot;&fcc_id=</A><br><small>--<br>Send Spam Here:  my.spamming.box@gmail.com<br>59346 Messages  as of Jan 10</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/19913168?c=1269649&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxOTkxMzE2OC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="84250 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=410 SRC="/r0/download/1269649.thumb600~b5875a5ff9133903e7fd9209bad4a213/2008-01-31_210343.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/19913168?c=1269650&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxOTkxMzE2OC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="212289 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=458 SRC="/r0/download/1269650.thumb600~cf5a4b441d4457ea09f882450e64437f/2008-01-31_210442.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>BroadCom Same chipset as the V8</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19913168</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:06:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
