| Uverse I'll gladly take the higher speed but they can take their uversetv and shove it. |
|
 CjaicemanPremium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO
kudos:2
 ·Comcast Business..
| said by BodyBumper:I'll gladly take the higher speed but they can take their uversetv and shove it. I agree, its nice they have those speeds, but after what they have said about bittorrent users I would never go to them for my main internet usage. Before I get flamed, I do actually use BT for legit uses, WOW updates are a big one, trials and linux ISO's are another. Revision3 shows are another big one for me as they download automatically. I'll stick to my Comcast, their sandvine is better than not being able to use BT at all.
--
HOT JAMZ 94FM
Listen Live at »sc7.shoutcaststreaming.us:8206/listen.pls |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to BodyBumper
I agree... I'll take the Internet, but I don't want their MS IPTV.
Also, it mentions $55 when bundled with TV. How much without IPTV ? Where do you order it standalone ? Oh wait, they don't advertise it standalone. 
As far as their 3G goes, I had and used 3G voice w/o issues.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
| reply to Cjaiceman
I don't see the problem then if you use BT for legit purposes. They never said anything about throttling bandwidth...Yet... |
|
 SpyderCKEWe call that the Dennis Miller RatioPremium
join:2000-10-26
Milwaukee, WI | reply to en102
I think it's 10 bucks more a month. In any case, I have UVerse now, and probably am going to get rid of TV soon. If they start clamping down on Bittorent, I'll probably just go to dry loop dsl, provided by their.. left hand? It's a few bucks cheaper, but doesn't use this ridiculous gateway and seemed to be pretty damned reliable for me.
The TV is a joke though. The party really gets crashed by the WinCE boxes, which are just crap through and through.
--
See you on:
AA:SF - [69th SAG] SpyderCKE
XBL - H2 - eTard |
|
en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | It's been the reliability factor (compared to DirecTv) and installation time (many hours) as well as cost vs. what I have. For 3Mbps/U300/Uvoice, its at best equal in pricing to DSL that I currently have + POTS unlimited + DirecTv.
I would consider it for Internet only, or Internet + VoIP.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
NormanSPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4 Reviews:
 ·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to Cjaiceman
said by Cjaiceman:...but after what they have said about bittorrent users I would never go to them for my main internet usage... I don't recall that AT&T said anything about BT users in general, just that they plan to filter pirated content. The implication being that P2P transfer of legitimate files should not be affected. It remains to be seen if the technology to distinguish between authorized distribution and unauthorized distribution will work reliably, and on a large scale.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
