site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Cjaiceman
Premium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast Business..

reply to BodyBumper

Re: Uverse

said by BodyBumper:

I'll gladly take the higher speed but they can take their uversetv and shove it.
I agree, its nice they have those speeds, but after what they have said about bittorrent users I would never go to them for my main internet usage. Before I get flamed, I do actually use BT for legit uses, WOW updates are a big one, trials and linux ISO's are another. Revision3 shows are another big one for me as they download automatically. I'll stick to my Comcast, their sandvine is better than not being able to use BT at all.
--
HOT JAMZ 94FM
Listen Live at »sc7.shoutcaststreaming.us:8206/listen.pls


koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY

I don't see the problem then if you use BT for legit purposes. They never said anything about throttling bandwidth...Yet...


NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to Cjaiceman

said by Cjaiceman:

...but after what they have said about bittorrent users I would never go to them for my main internet usage...
I don't recall that AT&T said anything about BT users in general, just that they plan to filter pirated content. The implication being that P2P transfer of legitimate files should not be affected. It remains to be seen if the technology to distinguish between authorized distribution and unauthorized distribution will work reliably, and on a large scale.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

Tuesday, 29-May 18:45:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics