how-to block ads
|
Tzale
Proud Libertarian Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
Sweden
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to satellite68
Re: T-Mobile
said by satellite68  :(pfffffffffffpffffffffffffttttttttttttt) Again, you can read a fucking contract all day long, but if the terms aren't there, and are added in the future, no matter how ridiculous (how about double billing per month...triple billing...) you're just ducky about giving it all because you "signed a contract"?? You sir, are an idiot, and if your "reasoning" is as elementary as "you signed a contract", well I'd hate to see what you're like in the workplace, or some other stressful situation. God bless the people around you. (rolls eyes) The education system in Kentucky must be as bad as I heard..  If you can't use some simple logic and ask ALL questions prior to entering into a contract / business agreement, then you shouldn't be doing business... It might not be T-Mobile's best move to be doing this, but they are not doing anything illegal. If they told people they could turn off the service or cancel their contracts if they were spammed, prior to signing of the contract, then they would be wrong for denying them. Otherwise, fair game.
-Tzale
--
Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
| |
satellite68
join:2007-04-11
Louisville, KY
1 edit | reply to Tzale
(pfffffffffffpffffffffffffttttttttttttt)
Again, you can read a fucking contract all day long, but if the terms aren't there, and are added in the future, no matter how ridiculous (how about double billing per month...triple billing...) you're just ducky about giving it all because you "signed a contract"??
You sir, are an idiot, and if your "reasoning" is as elementary as "you signed a contract", well I'd hate to see what you're like in the workplace, or some other stressful situation. God bless the people around you. (rolls eyes) | |
Tzale
Proud Libertarian Conservative
Premium
join:2004-01-06
Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| reply to tcope
said by tcope :So your first thought was that they should have read the contract. When your error was pointed out you stated that they should go to another provider. When again your error was pointed out your response now is that customers should have some how thought of the idea that this odd situation could happen at some point and then searched for an answer (again, to a problem that did not yet exist). Does your head come out of your butt at any time? About the stupidest things I've ever seen posted. 'course, you could side step the real issue again and change your reasoning. I've never changed my views.. Simple.. Read the contract, ask whatever questions you have and make a decision... You're the one with serious problems...
You didn't prove me wrong at all.. Your posts make no sense.
--
Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not real conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 »www.usconstitution.net/const.html
| |
tcope
Premium
join:2003-05-07
Sandy, UT
·Comcast
2 edits | reply to Tzale
said by Tzale :said by tcope :said by battleop :Uhm. Ok if you don't like the policy then don't buy their service. It's not like they are the only cell phone provider out there. Just happens to be a little something called a contract. TM won't allow people to break it without a fine. Again, customers were not told they would be getting spam text messages and they were not told that they could not stop this "service" they never asked for. But to add to that, TM simply _won't_ turn off the service those people don't want. They should have picked a service that allowed them to turn off that feature... They could have researched this better prior to locking into the contract. Their fault.. Sorry... And usually I don't side with big corporations, but this time... Sorry. So your first thought was that they should have read the contract. When your error was pointed out you stated that they should go to another provider. When again your error was pointed out your response now is that customers should have some how thought of the idea that this odd situation could happen at some point and then searched for an answer (again, to a problem that did not yet exist). {inappropriate remark removed and apology inserted} . About the stupidest things I've ever seen posted.
'course, you could side step the real issue again and change your reasoning. | |
|
