<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Partial deregulation limited to dense areas in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19925717</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:35:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:35:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Partial deregulation limited to dense areas</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19925717</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.scc.virginia.gov/news/c_verrecon_08.htm" >www.scc.virginia.gov/news/c_verrecon_08.htm</A><br><div class="bquote"> It granted Verizon deregulation of approximately more than 62% of all residential lines and 57% of business lines, plus statewide deregulation of bundled and some other services.<br><br>However, the evidence demonstrated there were some remaining areas of Virginia, mostly rural areas and in smaller towns and cities, where consumers do not have realistic alternatives to Verizon for reliable local telephone service sufficient to restrain Verizon's ability to raise prices.</div>This was partial deregulation only in certain areas.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</a><br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19925717</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:57:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
