Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » ICANN Nudges IPv6 Forward » So...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

reply to pkarlos_76
Re: So...

said by pkarlos_76 See Profile :

Hmm BYE BYE to claims by the ISP's they don't know who the IP addres belong to........US poor P2P Pirates that are P2P'ing Ubuntu Linux OS's, World of Warcraft updates, Joust, and Vuze and others can't hide no more.
The same reasons why ISPs don't track DHCP users now will exist with IPv6...they choose not to. It's a headache for them not only from a technological reason, but also with record keeping, legel requests, etc. It's much easier to turn a blind eye, shrug your shoulders, and say "Sorry, we don't keep track of that" then deal with all the crap if they did. Just like most businesses, if it costs them money and it's not required, they aren't inclined to do it.


pkarlos_76

join:2004-08-24
Edmonton, AB

reply to cdru
said by cdru See Profile :

ISP's charge per ISP because they can....but also because IP addresses are at a premium because they are in limited supply. ISPs also may only have a limited block of addresses that they can allocate so in order to ration them, they charge extra.

With IPv6, all the supply issues go away. A 128 bit address space, you literally could give an ip address to every grain of sand on the planet and still not run out. Every person/subscriber in the world could get their own block of 1K addresses to allocate as they want and there would still be more addresses then anyone knows what to do with.

Now that doesn't mean that ISPs won't still charge for them, but they won't be able to use the excuse that they are in limited supply. Dynamic addresses also could go away . It would only be a matter of the ISP updating their router tables for new customers as they sign up.
Hmm BYE BYE to claims by the ISP's they don't know who the IP addres belong to........US poor P2P Pirates that are P2P'ing Ubuntu Linux OS's, World of Warcraft updates, Joust, and Vuze and others can't hide no more.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

reply to Kearnstd
ISP's charge per ISP because they can....but also because IP addresses are at a premium because they are in limited supply. ISPs also may only have a limited block of addresses that they can allocate so in order to ration them, they charge extra.

With IPv6, all the supply issues go away. A 128 bit address space, you literally could give an ip address to every grain of sand on the planet and still not run out. Every person/subscriber in the world could get their own block of 1K addresses to allocate as they want and there would still be more addresses then anyone knows what to do with.

Now that doesn't mean that ISPs won't still charge for them, but they won't be able to use the excuse that they are in limited supply. Dynamic addresses also could go away . It would only be a matter of the ISP updating their router tables for new customers as they sign up.

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

reply to Jerm
said by Jerm See Profile :

Advantage: 128bit addresses instead of 32bit allow for trillions of addresses (ie bye-bye NAT!)

Disadvantage: You now have to remember 2001:0db8:0eff:87a0:27bf:0000:1428:57ab instead.
loss of NAT concerns me greatly. atm ISPs charge per IP address(the main reason for homes to have NAT routers). id imagine it is a perfectly safe guess they would still charge huge amounts of money for more then one IP even if NAT was made obsolete by IP6 and they had the room for every device in every home they serve to have an IP.

brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON
reply to jester121
Huh? Was this supposed to be sarcasm?

To the poster above.. learn how to use a firewall properly. Posting comments like that shows you need a clue bat.

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
reply to elwoodblues
No, you have to spend every hour of the day and night configuring your firewall to allow access to everything.

elwoodblues
Elwood Blues

join:2006-08-30
Toronto, ON

reply to Jerm
said by Jerm See Profile :

Advantage: 128bit addresses instead of 32bit allow for trillions of addresses (ie bye-bye NAT!)

Disadvantage: You now have to remember 2001:0db8:0eff:87a0:27bf:0000:1428:57ab instead.
HUH? You are willing to expose every single piece of hardware you have in your network to the Internet? Do spend all day and night making sure all your OS's are secure?


Jerm

join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
reply to pkarlos_76
Advantage: 128bit addresses instead of 32bit allow for trillions of addresses (ie bye-bye NAT!)

Disadvantage: You now have to remember 2001:0db8:0eff:87a0:27bf:0000:1428:57ab instead.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to pkarlos_76
said by pkarlos_76 See Profile :

Could anyone explain the benefits and the disadvantages of IPV6?
Advanatges are that every device will be able to have its own address - even devices without a human interface.

Biggest disadvantage is the conversion process and all the problems that will result from running IPV4 & IpV6 side by side:
»ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2.02···rop.html
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page


pkarlos_76

join:2004-08-24
Edmonton, AB
reply to Mutiny32
Could anyone explain the benefits and the disadvantages of IPV6?
Forums » ICANN Nudges IPv6 Forward


Saturday, 05-Dec 03:38:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [89] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Sun Releases Update 17 for Java SE 6 [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]