republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

reply to Guspaz

Re: There is more to it...

said by Guspaz:

That's the thing though, Bell wholesalers are responsible for maintaining their own connection. The $20.50 connection fee and $1300 GigE to Bell only gets the user's packets to the ISP (TekSavvy)'s network. From there, the ISP is responsible for getting the packets out to the internet at large.

They currently have six GigE lines to various providers (Cogent, Teleglobe, Internap, Peer1, etc) for that purpose.

My point was that if you eliminate the two Bell-related charges, and possibly some of the equipment costs required to connect to Bell, you're left with TekSavvy's $9 per month or so. Inside of that, they're able to cover all expenses and provide 200GB of actual IP transit. For $19 ($39.95 to customer, $19 is roughly left over after Bell takes their cut), they're able to provide unlimited services, targeted at users who use over 300GB per month (300-500 is probably typical).

If TekSavvy can make a profit, I fail to see why Shareband, with very similar costs once Bell is removed from the equation, couldn't do the same thing.
Well, it remains to be seen. Lets see how this develops.
--
с новым годом

Tuesday, 29-May 14:24:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics