| subject goes here They probably should have stated some type of hard cap, because as it is my ability to use their network is already limited. It's limited by the tier of service that i pay for. |
|
 hopeflickerCapitalism breeds greedPremium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
kudos:1 | The company uses reasonable network management practices that are consistent with industry standards
What a load of dog crap!!
Throttling is not STANDARD
--
Man created God in his image : intolerant, sexist, homophobic and violent. |
|
 koitsuPremium,MVM
join:2002-07-16
Mountain View, CA
kudos:14 | said by hopeflicker:The company uses reasonable network management practices that are consistent with industry standardsWhat a load of dog crap!! Throttling is not STANDARD Clarification: injecting falsified/unsolicited TCP packets into a stream (sent bidirectionally nonetheless) is definitely NOT a standard.
Throttling (traffic shaping via QoS, rate-limiting, or even via packet loss) is a general standard. |
|
 DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA | In Canada maybe. |
|
 BabyBearKeep wise ...with Nite-Owl
join:2007-01-11 | reply to koitsu
said by koitsu:Clarification: injecting falsified/unsolicited TCP packets into a stream (sent bidirectionally nonetheless) is definitely NOT a standard. Throttling (traffic shaping via QoS, rate-limiting, or even via packet loss) is a general standard. Really? CISA* would disagree with you. 
*Comcastic International Standards Assoc. |
|
|
|
