Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Changes TOS In Response To Traffic Shaping Firestorm » Sigh...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« IMHO..  
AuthorAll Replies

mikenolan7
Premium
join:2005-06-07
Torrance, CA
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to telcolackey
Re: Sigh...

Can't please them all, therefore we can advertise whatever we want, and they get whatever we give them. How on earth does "you can't please them all" justify false advertising to everyone?

There is a simple solution here. Advertised data rates should include a percentage of time that the data rate is available. Don't spout BS about that's what you pay extra for on a business connection. Lower the uptime and availability numbers from the business connections. No more 784kb/6mb connections that run at that rate 10% of the time, unless you advertise it that way. If you advertise 90% availability, and it only reaches that rate 10% of the time, you deduct 80% from the bill. End of arguments. End of excuses. Tell the truth and you won't have to spend so much on lawyers.


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Site5.com
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast

reply to telcolackey
said by telcolackey See Profile :

Not sure it is possible to make everyone happy. Top 1% is not happy that bandwidth is not 100mb, unlimited and free. Bottom 20% don't care about unlimited BW and want it cheaper. Middle of the road think the bandwidth is fine, but are not happy that they are subsidizing the top 1%'s DVD download library.

Can't please them all.
The only way to do that is to use a tiered pricing structure which Comcast is doing. Along with that though, they should be lifting bandwidth limitations for all users who get the top tier.


knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to telcolackey
said by telcolackey See Profile :

Not sure it is possible to make everyone happy. Top 1% is not happy that bandwidth is not 100mb, unlimited and free. Bottom 20% don't care about unlimited BW and want it cheaper. Middle of the road think the bandwidth is fine, but are not happy that they are subsidizing the top 1%'s DVD download library.

Can't please them all.
Given that bandwidth is shared, the middle would only be affected if everyone else on their shared pipe was burning up P2P apps, in which case they would be the minority of the group instead of the "top" of everyone else left. So unless the top bandwidth users have found a way to "control" what is allocated to them, the arguments of them using all the bandwidth falls apart when you examine it from a technical standpoint.

So some confusion is:
Are they affecting network performance as a whole? Maybe.

Are they taking all of "your" bandwidth? No, they are sharing just like you.

Can the ISP better tune it's performance? Sure, that's what QoS and Traffic Shaping was invented for.

Is blocking traffic the same as QoS and Traffic Shaping? No, by definition, QoS and Traffic Shaping don't stop traffic, just control it's flow based on a set of rules. Blocking P2P is identical to blocking HTTP or PPTP traffic, except more people would get upset if they couldn't web surf or connect to the company VPN. Customer service nightmare for sure.


Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to telcolackey
said by telcolackey See Profile :

Middle of the road think the bandwidth is fine, but are not happy that they are subsidizing the top 1%'s DVD download library.Can't please them all.
And I'm not happy that I had to subsidize the MoR's who couldn't be bothered to live somewhere with existing infrastructure so that I had to pay for their new lines to be run.

Since Everybody subsidizes Each Other, how is it a relevant discussion point?

NV
--
Abortion: A Republican Plot to Thin the Liberal Herd.


telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth

join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA

reply to gatorkram
Not sure it is possible to make everyone happy. Top 1% is not happy that bandwidth is not 100mb, unlimited and free. Bottom 20% don't care about unlimited BW and want it cheaper. Middle of the road think the bandwidth is fine, but are not happy that they are subsidizing the top 1%'s DVD download library.

Can't please them all.
--
"Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear." - Dinah Craik
Forums » Comcast Changes TOS In Response To Traffic Shaping Firestorm« IMHO..  


Friday, 27-Nov 22:01:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Question for DSL Co CEO's - Competition Bureau do u use it? [Canadian Broadband]
· [Scam] Cruise line mail? [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]