republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Uniqs:
2687
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

IMHO..

We need to move on from this issue.

Those who this is ultimately affecting are the extreme..way over the top users who feel that they have the right to everything and anything for one low price.

I..and the vast majority of Comcast customers are very satisfied with our service and expect this company to do whatever it takes to preserve exactly that and to deliver a quality experience for the majority of us..not the minority.

What regular visitors to the comcast forum at this site know is that Comcast has VERY liberal usage policies allowing for upwards of 20Mb speeds with powerboost..as well as VERY generous "caps" exceeding 200 to 300 Gigs per month of downloading.

What we have ALL seen is other isp's who..when pressed to the wall on this issue..have THEN had to state their policies to allow for perhaps only 20 to 30 gigs.
Comcast hasn't done that..but what is being risked here in continuing to press them on this issue is that they will be FORCED to do that. Obviously they don't want to..and haven't...but if this minority is allowed to continue to speak on this issue..and given this continued voice to do so by BBR in the process...then that is most likely exactly what could wind up happening.

Comcast..nor any isp for that matter..does not owe any customer these kinds of speeds and download amounts for this kind of a price on an absolutely unlimited basis 24/7.
These networks have limitations that can cause the service to totally crash for the rest of us..and it is comcasts responsibility to protect us from that which is exactly what they are doing.

This company is more than fair in what they allow the vast majority of us for this kind of price..and I believe are even going above and beyond what they even need to do in the interest of delivering us a very quality product and experience.

If the bandwidth hogs want what they want..then they should seek out other resources and isp's to get that.
Perhaps they should pay for their own unlimted 20,000k pipe that would probably cost them 10,000 or more per month.
WE..as their regular customers..do not owe that to them.
Nor do we want to subsidize their activities any longer.

If they have a problem with this..then move to another isp's territory. Or split their usage up among a second connection.

BBR should STOP promoting their interests which is, in fact..endorsing them. Publicly posting under the guise of "news" workarounds as to how they can get around this only puts yourself in the light of being something that you really shouldn't be yourselves IMHO.

Comcast..keep right on doing what you're doing.

The vast majority of us respect you for it..and appreciate it.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!

pokesph
It Is Almost Fast
Premium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1

Re: IMHO..

said by Rick:

We need to move on from this issue.

Those who this is ultimately affecting are the extreme..way over the top users who feel that they have the right to everything and anything for one low price.

I..and the vast majority of Comcast customers are very satisfied with our service and expect this company to do whatever it takes to preserve exactly that and to deliver a quality experience for the majority of us..not the minority.

What regular visitors to the comcast forum at this site know is that Comcast has VERY liberal usage policies allowing for upwards of 20Mb speeds with powerboost..as well as VERY generous "caps" exceeding 200 to 300 Gigs per month of downloading.

What we have ALL seen is other isp's who..when pressed to the wall on this issue..have THEN had to state their policies to allow for perhaps only 20 to 30 gigs.
Comcast hasn't done that..but what is being risked here in continuing to press them on this issue is that they will be FORCED to do that. Obviously they don't want to..and haven't...but if this minority is allowed to continue to speak on this issue..and given this continued voice to do so by BBR in the process...then that is most likely exactly what could wind up happening.

Comcast..nor any isp for that matter..does not owe any customer these kinds of speeds and download amounts for this kind of a price on an absolutely unlimited basis 24/7.
These networks have limitations that can cause the service to totally crash for the rest of us..and it is comcasts responsibility to protect us from that which is exactly what they are doing.

This company is more than fair in what they allow the vast majority of us for this kind of price..and I believe are even going above and beyond what they even need to do in the interest of delivering us a very quality product and experience.

If the bandwidth hogs want what they want..then they should seek out other resources and isp's to get that.
Perhaps they should pay for their own unlimted 20,000k pipe that would probably cost them 10,000 or more per month.
WE..as their regular customers..do not owe that to them.
Nor do we want to subsidize their activities any longer.

If they have a problem with this..then move to another isp's territory. Or split their usage up among a second connection.

BBR should STOP promoting their interests which is, in fact..endorsing them. Publicly posting under the guise of "news" workarounds as to how they can get around this only puts yourself in the light of being something that you really shouldn't be yourselves IMHO.

Comcast..keep right on doing what you're doing.

The vast majority of us respect you for it..and appreciate it.
OR Comcast could build out it's inferstructure to handle oh, lets say 80% of the speeds/bandwidth it offers to it's customers.

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Clear Wireless

Re: IMHO..

said by pokesph:

OR Comcast could build out it's inferstructure to handle oh, lets say 80% of the speeds/bandwidth it offers to it's customers.
Which is skewed by the fact that 90+% of their customers will never drive the network that hard.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
You don't have respond to these threads nor read them.

I think these articles are reasonable since Comcast did deny it was doing anything. Now, why did they deny it if they don't think it is wrong?

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

Re: IMHO..

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.

What they did deny is that they don't block access to any sites. And, they don't.

As for what I do or don't respond to..that is my business.
I believe that my opinion however is shared by the vast majority of comcast users..at least those who's posts I have read. It is the very small..bandwidth hogging..expects everyone else to foot their bill for them..wants everything for nothing crowd..who seems to oppose me however.

And, I guess that's just too bad.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: IMHO..

They USED to advertise their service as unlimited.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: IMHO..

said by Dogfather:

They USED to advertise their service as unlimited.
But they still primarily advertise it as a big fat pipe where you can download all the music and video you can think of faster than you can think of the titles to look for. Same thing.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

BabyBear
Keep wise ...with Nite-Owl

join:2007-01-11

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

said by RadioDoc:

said by Dogfather:

They USED to advertise their service as unlimited.
But they still primarily advertise it as a big fat pipe where you can download all the music and video you can think of faster than you can think of the titles to look for. Same thing.
Around here they advertise themselves as "enlightenment", what ever the farq thats supposed to mean.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

2 edits

Re: IMHO..

I'm just up the Tri-State from you so we get the same commercials. I laugh when I see those...I guess they ran out of "highspeed".
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

Not as funny as the craptasic ads. Comcast is so bad that Comcastic is a derogatory term nowadays.

BabyBear
Keep wise ...with Nite-Owl

join:2007-01-11
Yeah I knew that, was mentioning for the out-of-towners.

Comcast #1 with Buddhist Monks!

PaulHikeS2

join:2003-03-06
Manchester, NH
said by Dogfather:

They USED to advertise their service as unlimited.
And Ford used to advertise a Pinto for $2499. If it's not an advertisement from the past couple of months then it's totally irrelevant. When exactly did Comcast advertise their service as unlimited?
--
Jay: What the @#$% is the internet???

i1me2ao
Premium
join:2001-03-03
TEXAS

Re: IMHO..

always here locally..

PaulHikeS2

join:2003-03-06
Manchester, NH

Re: IMHO..

link?

i1me2ao
Premium
join:2001-03-03
TEXAS

Re: IMHO..

»consumerist.com/consumer/comcast···5585.php
--
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/

gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
said by Rick:

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.

What they did deny is that they don't block access to any sites. And, they don't.

As for what I do or don't respond to..that is my business.
I believe that my opinion however is shared by the vast majority of comcast users..at least those who's posts I have read. It is the very small..bandwidth hogging..expects everyone else to foot their bill for them..wants everything for nothing crowd..who seems to oppose me however.

And, I guess that's just too bad.
That's funny because every single person I have talked to can't wait to dump Comcast. And it's not just for blocking torrents
Anyone who has seen my OTA HDTV has asked me how they can set it up so they can stop paying a greedy company who lies to their customers.
--
‘Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,
Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,
With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will
We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.’
Solon

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

Re: IMHO..

said by gaforces:

said by Rick:

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.

What they did deny is that they don't block access to any sites. And, they don't.

As for what I do or don't respond to..that is my business.
I believe that my opinion however is shared by the vast majority of comcast users..at least those who's posts I have read. It is the very small..bandwidth hogging..expects everyone else to foot their bill for them..wants everything for nothing crowd..who seems to oppose me however.

And, I guess that's just too bad.
That's funny because every single person I have talked to can't wait to dump Comcast. And it's not just for blocking torrents
Anyone who has seen my OTA HDTV has asked me how they can set it up so they can stop paying a greedy company who lies to their customers.
A greedy company?
I don't know about you but I tend to think that a company that charges 1.43 per day for a 20Mb + pipe with powerboost and lets you download about 300 Gigs per month of data on it for that low a price is one that is far from greedy.

In fact, I'd call that downright generous.

Companies used to charge 3 times that amount per hour for dial up service and rip off companies like AT&T charge half that amount for what amounts to not even 1/20th those kinds of speeds.

300 gigs per month is a HUGE amount of data for this company to allow their customers. After all, we all read about the companies who DO cap their customers..and do so at about 1/10th those amounts.

Comcast really is one of the best ISP's out there IMHO.
In fact, it's really hard for me to imagine a better one.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!

i1me2ao
Premium
join:2001-03-03
TEXAS
yes they have implied unlimited emails and downoading and enjoying the high speed broadband experience. they still run the dam commercials..
--
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
said by Rick:

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.

What they did deny is that they don't block access to any sites. And, they don't.
BUT, they did forge packets which they did deny. Not until they were confronted by the evidence did they admit they did that.

said by Rick:

As for what I do or don't respond to..that is my business.
I believe that my opinion however is shared by the vast majority of comcast users..at least those who's posts I have read. It is the very small..bandwidth hogging..expects everyone else to foot their bill for them..wants everything for nothing crowd..who seems to oppose me however.

And, I guess that's just too bad.
Again, that wasn't the point. The point is you hate seeing these posts. If you hate them so much, why respond to them and add more fuel to the fire. We all know your bias and that is your choosing but these stories about what Comcast is or is not doing have merit especially when they are not forthcoming with truthful information.

You don't have to like it, just accept it.

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
Reviews:
·VOIPo

Re: IMHO..

said by moonpuppy:

said by Rick:

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.

What they did deny is that they don't block access to any sites. And, they don't.
BUT, they did forge packets which they did deny. Not until they were confronted by the evidence did they admit they did that.

said by Rick:

As for what I do or don't respond to..that is my business.
I believe that my opinion however is shared by the vast majority of comcast users..at least those who's posts I have read. It is the very small..bandwidth hogging..expects everyone else to foot their bill for them..wants everything for nothing crowd..who seems to oppose me however.

And, I guess that's just too bad.
Again, that wasn't the point. The point is you hate seeing these posts. If you hate them so much, why respond to them and add more fuel to the fire. We all know your bias and that is your choosing but these stories about what Comcast is or is not doing have merit especially when they are not forthcoming with truthful information.

You don't have to like it, just accept it.
Best post ever, moonpuppy!

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT
"BUT, they did forge packets which they did deny."

Really? Did they? Is that a fact or just a continuation of a figment of your wild imagination?

What Comcast said was they don't block access to any web site or application. And, what they said was they do have the right to manage their network and to prevent it from abuse.

I don't see anything in those statements that come close to what you claim they said.

Really..what the bottom line here is is that we have an isp that is giving we customers upwards of 20,000k speeds with powerboost...and allowing up to upload and download some 300 gigs of data per month.

All for the amazingly low price of 1.43 cents per day on average.

Now..I don't know about you and the world you live in..but in mine that is a VERY reasonable price..and in fact..a VERY generous one at that for all that they do allow.

It's a well known fact that current docsis technology does have it's limitations. And, one of those limitations is that peer to peer type of activity...namely the uploading and saturating of the upstream channels..can have a VERY negative impact on all users. And so, what we have is a very small minority who cause a LOT of problems for the majority.

Comcast has the right..and in fact..the obligation..to protect the majority of we users from that kind of activity.
And, they do so quite effectively with their current network management.

Is it perfect? Obviously not. At least for the very small number of people who are impacted by it. But..you see..it's generally those small number of people anyway who really feel that it should all be free anyway...and that Comcast should be giving them their own 20,000k private fiber connection to the internet or something..and let them do whatever they want with it.

It just doesn't work that way. If these individuals would like to go out and spend 10,000 per month themselves on their own pipe that could offer them that..then more power to them. I'm sure that AT&T would be more than happy to assist them in setting it up. Before they go out of business anyway from their Uverse fiasco.

As for the rest of us..I think the vast majority are reasonable people. And realize what a great value and service we have in Comcast.

In fact..I'd say it's one of the best isp's in America..if not the best.
Speed for speed..and dollar for dollar..

It certainly beats just about anything the telco's have..and certainly most dsl plans.

It's amazing that you like to focus so much on comcast..while apparently your own ISP..namely Verizon..charges such a huge amount of money for their dsl service..for what is generally such a very slow offering.

Comcast is all about speed..and value.

And, whatever it is they're doing..I certainly hope they keep it up.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

Re: IMHO..

said by Rick:

"BUT, they did forge packets which they did deny."

Really? Did they? Is that a fact or just a continuation of a figment of your wild imagination?
Read here:

»Comcast Denies They're Violating Network Neutrality

said by Rick:

What Comcast said was they don't block access to any web site or application. And, what they said was they do have the right to manage their network and to prevent it from abuse.

I don't see anything in those statements that come close to what you claim they said.
Really? Forging packets is degrading service.

Now, if they can manage their network the way they want, why not block the traffic? Nope, it is better to degrade it and deny it. If you think forging packets is not degrading traffic, you have other issues.

said by Rick:

Really..what the bottom line here is is that we have an isp that is giving we customers upwards of 20,000k speeds with powerboost...and allowing up to upload and download some 300 gigs of data per month.

All for the amazingly low price of 1.43 cents per day on average.
Powerboost is a joke. I had it and was less than impressed. Plus, it doesn't last long. As for your 300GB of data, Comcast has sent letters for less.

said by Rick:

Now..I don't know about you and the world you live in..but in mine that is a VERY reasonable price..and in fact..a VERY generous one at that for all that they do allow.
That's your point of view. Some do not agree with you.

said by Rick:

Comcast has the right..and in fact..the obligation..to protect the majority of we users from that kind of activity.
And, they do so quite effectively with their current network management.
Did you have an extra glass of Comcast Kool-Aid when you wrote that?

That might be the case but to lie about it is a different issue.

said by Rick:

As for the rest of us..I think the vast majority are reasonable people. And realize what a great value and service we have in Comcast.

In fact..I'd say it's one of the best isp's in America..if not the best.
Speed for speed..and dollar for dollar..

It certainly beats just about anything the telco's have..and certainly most dsl plans.
Really? According to many on this site, they do not share your opinion. In fact, you seem to be fighting pretty hard for your side while most seem to be against you.

As for being one of the the best ISPs, that is laughable. I had Comcast and now have Verizon DSL. Verizon is a much better service IMO and I pay less.

said by Rick:

It's amazing that you like to focus so much on comcast..while apparently your own ISP..namely Verizon..charges such a huge amount of money for their dsl service..for what is generally such a very slow offering.

Comcast is all about speed..and value.

And, whatever it is they're doing..I certainly hope they keep it up.
Let's see. Comcast was $45/month. Verizon is $15. Comcast is limited newsgroups. Verizon is unlimited. Comcast sends out letters for those who go against the invisible caps. Verizon doesn't send out letters. And before you say anything, I had Comcast for over 4 years in 2 locations.

Let's add I know people who use the FIOS service and they give it higher marks over Comcast.

Try again.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

Re: IMHO..

lol..Try again?
DSL..dollar for dollar..speed versus speed..is VASTLY more expensive than Comcasts service.

You PAY less because you get a whole lot less.
A dsl customer pays upwards of 20.00 and more for 768k speeds.
A comcast customer..42.95 per month for powerboost speeds TWENTY times those #'s.
That would value the REAL cost of the dsl at about FOUR HUNDRED dollars versus Comcasts service.

DSL..the bargain? Give me a break. That dog just won't hunt!

As for your other points..they just won't hunt either.
You seem insistent on putting words in Comcasts mouth that they never said.

You seem concerned about comcast's "lies". Perhaps it's you who needs a visit to the confession booth at your local church.

Comcast does not have the obligation to fund someones illegal ptp file trading activities with an unlimited 20,000k pipe as you seem to propose.
The only reason your verizon connection doesn't have the issue is because it's so damn slow, you'd never hit the caps anyway!

Comcast isn't trying to be all things to all people..and certainly not the isp to the bandwidth hogs who want it all for nothing.

The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of us are VERY happy with our speeds and the VERY generous 300gig per month caps that Comcast has.

And, if someone doesn't like it..i'd suggest they do what you did. Go to the slowskys and pick up a 768k ~ 1500k dinosaur of a connection and run around crowing about how little you pay.

They'll be in great company with you for sure!
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

Re: IMHO..

said by Rick:

lol..Try again?
DSL..dollar for dollar..speed versus speed..is VASTLY more expensive than Comcasts service.

You PAY less because you get a whole lot less.
A dsl customer pays upwards of 20.00 and more for 768k speeds.
A comcast customer..42.95 per month for powerboost speeds TWENTY times those #'s.
That would value the REAL cost of the dsl at about FOUR HUNDRED dollars versus Comcasts service.
What good is a service if there is a limit to it. Comcast sends out letters for less than the 300GB figure you mentioned before. Therefore, you could hit your cap WAY earlier on your Comcast service than my DSL service. Comcast will penalize you for using the service.

Plus, if you want more than 2GB out of the newsgroups, you have to pay for it with Comcast. With Verizon, I have it.

said by Rick:

DSL..the bargain? Give me a break. That dog just won't hunt!
That dog is hunting pretty well if Comcast still shows the "Slowskis" commercials. If the dog wouldn't hunt, why advertise against it?

said by Rick:

As for your other points..they just won't hunt either.
You seem insistent on putting words in Comcasts mouth that they never said.

You seem concerned about comcast's "lies". Perhaps it's you who needs a visit to the confession booth at your local church.
All my points hunt real well. You seem to turn a blind eye to common sense as do most company shills like yourself.

My conscience is clean. No confession needed here.

said by Rick:

Comcast does not have the obligation to fund someones illegal ptp file trading activities with an unlimited 20,000k pipe as you seem to propose.
The only reason your verizon connection doesn't have the issue is because it's so damn slow, you'd never hit the caps anyway!
Comcast has no obligation to help spammers yet they do when people's machines get infected and start spewing crap but they turn a blind eye to it. As for al P2P being illegal, that is laughable to say the least. My Verizon connection does very well and I don't have to worry about a cap because we don't have one.

said by Rick:

Comcast isn't trying to be all things to all people..and certainly not the isp to the bandwidth hogs who want it all for nothing.

The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of us are VERY happy with our speeds and the VERY generous 300gig per month caps that Comcast has.
Comcast would love to have Joe Email and Suzy Spreadsheet because those people don't use their connection. However, what good is a fast connection if you don't need speed?

And we know that 300GB is not official and there have been reports of people getting letters for much less.

said by Rick:

And, if someone doesn't like it..i'd suggest they do what you did. Go to the slowskys and pick up a 768k ~ 1500k dinosaur of a connection and run around crowing about how little you pay.

They'll be in great company with you for sure!
Many have done that and many others have gone to FIOS. FIOS is gaining subscribers all over the place and if you think Comcast is not worried, then you are truly blind. Again, if Comcast had no worries about DSL, then why even run the commercials?

Sure, you will have the rest of your company shills on your side but the consumers do not share your opinion. The consumers are the ones who keep your company alive.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

This post is to the two posters above..moon puppy and radio doc. (hereafter referred to as radiopuppy)

Because your message is essentially the same..and dead wrong as wrong can be IMHO..I'll combine my response to the two of you.

First..to the good doc. My post should dispel any false rumors that comcast isn't offering 20,000k + speeds for 42.95.

And, to the crowd that likes to claim it's only for the first 5 seconds of the download..my post also dispels that false rumor you all just love to put out there in defense of your ever dying telco industry.

2.26MB at 40 MB + into the file.
My oh my oh my.

But..of course..I already knew that. Because I actually use the service..whereas you're obviously out here posting for different reasons.

And so, to the Good doc who accuses me of not answering the questions..
there's the direct answer to you.
"I defy you to find a 20 megabit Comcast connection for $42.95 that is not some limited promo price or in a market where they are running for their lives (see: Utopia an FIOS)."

I just defied you.

And now, to moonpuppy.

Let's consider these results for a moment..and then compare them to what dsl offers the vast majority of their customers.

768k to 1500k for 20 to 25?
3,000k for the same to maybe 30?
Are those the speeds and prices you're referring to as the "value" among telcos versus comcast?

Well..guess what?
Your beloved dsl offerings are VASTLY..HUGELY..and OUTRAGEOUSLY priced versus my and others comcast connections.

Flat out..dollar for dollar..you'd be paying almost TWO HUNDRED PER MONTH for an equivalent speed offering as comcast customers pay.

Who's the expensive one? Who has the very slow solution?
Who is the RIPOFF????

Guess what?
It's sure not Comcast!!

And, EVEN DOC..with his 6Mb 40.00 connection..is STILL paying something upwards of 120.00 per month COMPARED to what I am with comcast.

Is it any wonder why Comcast is growing SO damn rapidly?
Because they are the VALUE LEADER in the tv..Internet..AND phone space.

My friends..people are not dumb. And I certainly am not dumb.
We understand VALUE when we see it.

And, it's why so many subscribe to this service..and why so many more will as they understand the truth..and facts..behind the distortions that some would like to post here.

Myth # 2.
Comcast and their caps.
As you both know..I've been around bbr for quite a while now..and seen many a post. And, seen many a post in the comcast forum.

And, while some like to accuse Comcast of having "caps"..the fact of the matter is..those caps if they really exist at all are in the STRATOSPHERE. Comcast is not out to deny me or anyone our rightful access to the service.
What they ARE out to protect..is the vast majority of their customer base who simply do not abuse this service.
And, they have every right to do that..and we customers expect them to do just that.

Comcast does not have an obligation to give someone a non stop..24/7..all month long 20Mb connection and let them abuse it to the detriment of everyone else.

As good as the service is today..it has it's technological limitations. And the fact is..if they let people saturate the upstream for an extended period of time..and enough people did it..the whole service would grind to a halt for everyone.

It is the technology as it exists today in the network..not the will of comcast to deny us anything.
And, just as in many examples in life..it's up to people to not abuse something beyond it's limitations.

Sadly..some..and what seems to be a very few..simply do not understand that and haven't gotten the message.
As generous as comcast is with speeds and caps..they still feel they own the whole network to themselves apparently.
And Comcast must guard against that just the way any operator of anything must guard against their business.

This doesn't mean that it will be this way forever. With docsis 3.0 coming..it will undoubtedly help relieve this situation even more..and hopefully some day it won't be an issue at all.
But..today it is. And even despite that..I believe completely that Comcast is and has addressed it fairly..and has given we users more than our fair share for the money we pay each month.

It simply boggles my mind why you expect them to give their customers more for the money. The speeds I have demonstrated here for the money are a HUGE value..and truly do show how outrageously expensive the telcos really are.
You'd like people here to believe that comcast is the bad guys. I see it differently..and believe the companies you're supporting are the real rip offs for the most part.

And finally, to address the issue for one last time here..because I believe have both answered the questions and directly replied to the questions.. What comcast has said is that they do not block access to anything. And, they don't.
What comcast HAS said is that they take reasonable measures to preserve and protect their network.
And, obviously they do.

And, they should.
And..the vast majority of customers want them to I believe.

And the rest?

They should just sign up for a slow as he** dsl plan and really find out what life is like on the Dark side.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: IMHO..

Not sure it is worth it to read all of that but I'll try.

I prefer moondoc.

Where is your proof of $42.95?

Since high speed Internet is not billed per kilobit of speed your math is quite odd. I can use similar odd math: How about computing what you are paying for before you hit the ceiling? Assuming you are using your connection (like those "illegals" you like to trot out) and Comcast has a 300 gigabyte limit, that means you'll hit that limit at about 1.6 days of use. So, rounding up, your Comcast connection effectively costs you $21.47 a day of use (assuming your price includes the underlying cable charges and add-on fees) before you are cut off for overuse. My DSL connection has no such restrictions and is $1.74 per day of use. I will pass your 300 GB ceiling in about 5.5 days after which I will still be able to use my connection unlike you who will be in trouble with the bandwidth police.

You still have not answered any of the questions posed to you.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
said by Rick:

This post is to the two posters above..moon puppy and radio doc. (hereafter referred to as radiopuppy)
Wow, a personal attack from a company shill. How original.

said by Rick:

First..to the good doc. My post should dispel any false rumors that comcast isn't offering 20,000k + speeds for 42.95.

And, to the crowd that likes to claim it's only for the first 5 seconds of the download..my post also dispels that false rumor you all just love to put out there in defense of your ever dying telco industry.

2.26MB at 40 MB + into the file.
My oh my oh my.
Really? Care to explan why I never saw those speeds or powerboost for that long of a time you had? Motorola Surfboard 4100 was the modem.

said by Rick:

But..of course..I already knew that. Because I actually use the service..whereas you're obviously out here posting for different reasons.
Wrong again. If you actually saw my postings, you would I know I got rid of Comcast not 30 days ago.

said by Rick:

And so, to the Good doc who accuses me of not answering the questions..
there's the direct answer to you.
"I defy you to find a 20 megabit Comcast connection for $42.95 that is not some limited promo price or in a market where they are running for their lives (see: Utopia an FIOS)."

I just defied you.
Comcast does not sell a 20MB/sec service. They sell, at most, a 16MB/sec service that is not $42.95/month. Powerboost is not on all the time so you cannot sell that speed continuously.

said by Rick:

And now, to moonpuppy.

Let's consider these results for a moment..and then compare them to what dsl offers the vast majority of their customers.

768k to 1500k for 20 to 25?
3,000k for the same to maybe 30?
Are those the speeds and prices you're referring to as the "value" among telcos versus comcast?

Well..guess what?
Your beloved dsl offerings are VASTLY..HUGELY..and OUTRAGEOUSLY priced versus my and others comcast connections.
Really? I pay less per month for speed that suits me just fine. Plus, I have full access to newsgroups (not a 2 GB limit like all Comcast customers do), and I don't have to worry about some phantom cap that does exist with Comcast. If it didn;t exist, then why are people being cut off?

said by Rick:

Flat out..dollar for dollar..you'd be paying almost TWO HUNDRED PER MONTH for an equivalent speed offering as comcast customers pay.

Who's the expensive one? Who has the very slow solution?
Who is the RIPOFF????
If they let you use it. Want to use Bit-Torrent for legal files, Comcast will forge packets so you can't use it. Verizon doesn't.

said by Rick:

Guess what?
It's sure not Comcast!!

And, EVEN DOC..with his 6Mb 40.00 connection..is STILL paying something upwards of 120.00 per month COMPARED to what I am with comcast.
If powerboost was 24/7 then I might agree with you but it isn't. You are worse than Comcast's own ad people who say one thing and sell another.

said by Rick:

Is it any wonder why Comcast is growing SO damn rapidly?
Because they are the VALUE LEADER in the tv..Internet..AND phone space.
From the people I have spken with, your phone service SUCKS. Constant issues and not reliable at all.

said by Rick:

My friends..people are not dumb. And I certainly am not dumb.
We understand VALUE when we see it.

And, it's why so many subscribe to this service..and why so many more will as they understand the truth..and facts..behind the distortions that some would like to post here.
Ask yourself why so many people are dropping Comcast to go to Verizon FIOS. Ask why the day I went to my local Comcast office to drop off my 2 cable boxes, there were no less than 5 people behind me doing the exact same thing. Churn is a nasty thing, isn't it.

said by Rick:

Myth # 2.
Comcast and their caps.
As you both know..I've been around bbr for quite a while now..and seen many a post. And, seen many a post in the comcast forum.

And, while some like to accuse Comcast of having "caps"..the fact of the matter is..those caps if they really exist at all are in the STRATOSPHERE. Comcast is not out to deny me or anyone our rightful access to the service.
What they ARE out to protect..is the vast majority of their customer base who simply do not abuse this service.
And, they have every right to do that..and we customers expect them to do just that.
First there are no caps, then they are but extreme limits. Care to be any more vague? Until Comcast comes clean about their policies and "caps" then they will be known as the ISP with invisible caps.

said by Rick:

As good as the service is today..it has it's technological limitations. And the fact is..if they let people saturate the upstream for an extended period of time..and enough people did it..the whole service would grind to a halt for everyone.
And you can throttle those people if you wanted too. However, you do a vague letter with some department that doesn't answer the phone. Let's add that Comcast will cut off a person using P2P but someone who is infectd with a spambot can go on for weeks and never be disconnected.

said by Rick:

It is the technology as it exists today in the network..not the will of comcast to deny us anything.
And, just as in many examples in life..it's up to people to not abuse something beyond it's limitations.
That's not what your commercials say.

said by Rick:

And finally, to address the issue for one last time here..because I believe have both answered the questions and directly replied to the questions.. What comcast has said is that they do not block access to anything. And, they don't.
What comcast HAS said is that they take reasonable measures to preserve and protect their network.
And, obviously they do.
Forging packets is blocking access.

said by Rick:

And the rest?

They should just sign up for a slow as he** dsl plan and really find out what life is like on the Dark side.
Funny, but I have one friend who loves his DSL after seeing my Comcast connection, another who hates his Comcast connection after being on DSL and a third who loves her FIOS service. Sorry, but Comcast can claim they are the best for only so long before they have to stand up and prove it. Sadly, they are losing ground. This is coming from someone from within your organization who tells me that Comcast is scared to death of Verizon.

Keep trying.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

Re: IMHO..

hmm..well..it would seem that the good Doc after having me so successfully defy his completely incorrect wrong assertion that I was..in fact..getting a 20Mb connection..and one that gives me that well into the 40Mb+ range as well..

has simply decided to move onto something else.

Well..that dog won't hunt. And neither will I. And so i'll bow out graciously from any further replies to his posts which seem to morph into something else entirely once he receives a direct response to his original question.

The fact of the matter is..that is what comcast users get..
for 42.95 per month..and compared to the very slow speeds that most dsl customers get..which are even lower at times than 1/20th of those speeds...

I'd say that my assessment that DSL is the vastly overpriced service is right on the mark.

But..I guess that most readers know that by now. Which is why so many cable companies are doing so well in terms of their growth..despite "SEEMINGLY" having higher prices overall. Educated consumers are a companies best customers.
And comcast customers can..and have..done the math on this one.

And, as far as moonpuppy goes..it would appear that you're trying to justify in your own mind your apparently ill fated decision to switch from Comcast to a far lesser performing..albeit "cheaper" service.

I truly hope that those few cents a day "savings" are worth it to you because dollar for dollar..the service itself certainly isn't.

The bottom line my friend is that a 768k line or a 1500k line for 20 to 25.00 per month is VASTLY overpriced compared Comcasts offerings.
What you and others are paying is sometimes well into the 200.00 per month + range for what comcast gives us for far less.

If you're happy with your service then I think that's great...and I'm happy for you.
But I just don't think any reasonable person who isn't either a telco employee..family member of one..or retiree from one counting on their pension checks really believes in your argument any longer.

A 1500k (with overhead that's really 1200k in disguise)..25.00 dsl line that comes with the added bonus of needing a landline that no one wants anymore either is simply a dinosaur in this quickly changing world.

And..sad to say..but AT&T's answer to that dinosaur is yet another one that will find itself extinct before you know it.
And that dinosaur is called Uverse.

While I honestly do try to be fair about this..I simply can't find anything in your beloved telcos worth cheering about. In fact..all I can see..particularly in AT&T..is a company that's getting ready to file Bankruptcy at some point in the not too distant future.
I mean..you simply can't lose as many landlines as they are...and try to compete with an operator giving 20 times the speeds..and still try to charge half the price..

and have a very viable company for very long.

These are very simple business basics IMHO.

While verizon and fios may be somewhat different..the fact is they're 10 years late to the fiber party as well..
and have a LOT of catching up to do.
I fear that it will be extremely difficult for them to do that and justify the 25 Billion dollar price tag they are now spending.
And, I fear that will result in customers continually being asked to foot the bill for their rollout of this science experiment.

Meanwhile..Comcast and the other cable co's like Time Warner already have their fiber networks in place.
And..docsis 3.0 is coming.

Comcast is already the nations #4 phone company.
How incredible is that Doc..in such a short amount of time?
Perhaps I could give you and your position more respect at times if you could simply acknowledge what a HUGE success that is..and how advanced comcasts network really now is to support this.

While the both of you seem to like to paint me as some pro Comcast poster here..at all costs...the fact of the matter is what I really am is pro consumer..and pro service.
And my kudos will go to whomever I think is deserving of it in those terms.
In other words..I could JUST as easily be pro AT&T Rick instead.

But try as I might..i can't find anything to be that for today.

I think sadly, they're a company of nothing but missteps..misadventures..and total blunders the last few years.

They refuse to acknowledge what is occurring, and are now trying to sell consumers 386sx computers in a world of quad core pentiums.

And, whether it is cheaper or not..time has clearly shown that that simply won't work. And technology is passing them by at a frenzied pace.

The REAL problem for them is that the problem is such a big one..AND..will take them a long time now to correct even if they wanted to.

I've given Verizon their credit for fios..where it's due.
But..my concerns there are that they are late to the party..it's expensive for them..and they're now trying to enter a business they really know little to nothing about.
The TV business. I think it's great that there is competition for consumers. And that is really what this should be all about..choice for us all.
But..just like rambus memory..and even intels support of it..even if that was better in many respects than ddr..
it was ddr that won. Because it was available..and the price..very competitive.

Say hello to Docsis 3.0 IMHO.

Because I think it's to broadband what DDR was to the memory world.

Am I right? We'll see. But what I am is two things in my professional career over the years.
A tech..and a businessman.

And both are saying to me that Comcast and the cable industry as a whole really has this right..

While the telco's have a lot of problems to contend with.

And now, might I suggest that your individual efforts might be better suited writing to your beloved respective companies..and asking..and perhaps pushing them to try to change.

Because I won't be changing my opinions despite whatever personal attacks I might face here.
I'm a man of my convictions.

And totally..and absolutely believe that I've called this one right from the very start.

Good evening to you both.

~Rick
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: IMHO..

No, the question was not what speed you were getting, but rather how much you were really paying for it. Which you still have not answered. Instead you go on and on and on with irrelevant nonsense. Which, especially here, seems to be your specialty: Baffle 'em with bullshit when you've lost your case.

You STILL have not answered the questions posed to you. Which at this point indicates you can't, or won't. Which invalidates your position. You can totally...and absolutely believe that [you have] called this one right from the very start but just because you believe it does not make it true, and no amount of off-topic rambling can whitewash your utterly failed arguments.

At least until you start answering the questions asked instead of making up your own.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

said by RadioDoc:

No, the question was not what speed you were getting, but rather how much you were really paying for it.
Well Doc..it's like this.

For less than the price of a mcd's value meal Comcast customers can get all this...

Virtually every channel comcast has to offer including all the premiums hbo cinemax starz showtime and TMC..

The sports tier...

Lots of High Def including the premiums..

On demand...

A DVR...

8000k/768k tier with powerboost up to 20,000k speeds.
An awesome HSI connection which gives me the Doc defying speeds I noted above...

digi phone with all the bells and whistles..voice mail..caller ID..call waiting..and probably 10 other features I forgot..not to mention local and long distance..

You see Doc..the price works out to be something like a happy meal would cost or something like 5 bucks and change a day for all of this.

Is that expensive? I dunno Doc. Is a pack of cigs expensive for someone? That probably costs about the same.

Or a gallon of milk and loaf of bread.

Now, I realize that many people would have to probably work a whopping 15 minutes or so per day to be able to afford literally everything that comcast has to offer..but at these prices..it would seem that even a lowly college student working at mcd's 4 hours a day could swing this.

Doc..I don't even bother to break out what the HSI part costs because the whole bundle is such a huge value...it would be downright stupid and foolish of someone to break it up and go a la carte IMHO.

But, I'd dare say that if I did..EASILY..the HSI connection that comes in at what looks like 3x's the speed of YOUR hsi connection probably costs only that 20 to 30.00/month figure that most of the slowskys are paying for 1/20th the speeds I get.

Doc..really..I hope that this has been direct enough for you.
Your first post challenged me to something that was easy for me to prove. And to disprove your position.
And now..you have this more than adequate direct response to your latest question.

Doc..comcast is one helluva value.

You really should consider jumping on board and treating yourself to the top of the line bundle.

Speed..and value galore. it's all built into it.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: IMHO..

Dear Rick,

I have read your amusing, highly entertaining overwrought missives frantically defending the farce which is Comcast. I want to thank you for lightening up the gray days of winter. You're a hoot!

However, as you already know, your online advertising has become a laughingstock. One would think a site MVM would know better, or at least put some thought into it. This latest one reads like the landfill fodder I get in the mail from Comcast every week.

Let's take a look at where you are failing:

You are asked to prove that you are actually paying what you claim is the cost of your service ($42.95) without any added fees or upsells like the cost of the underlying digital cable. You respond with McDonalds menu boards.

And cable TV premium channels nobody asked you about.

And add-on cable TV equipment nobody asked you about.

And telephone services nobody asked you about.

And then you are back to McDonalds again. You must be obsessed with Ronald. Or maybe the Hamburgler.

Cigarettes? Really?

Milk? Bread?

You certainly don't seem to be able to answer the question, probably because you were caught in a lie. A BIG FAT SMELLY LIE.

Nobody asked you to "go a la carte". You were asked what the true cost of your service is. You don't answer because you can't without exposing your LIE.

In fact, it appears that everything you post is a LIE.

Now, is that really what a site "most valuable member" should be doing? Writing corporate PR pieces and posting them to site comment threads? Maybe you aren't really a MVM.

We are still waiting for your justification of Comcast breaking the basic underlying networking protocol of the Internet merely and solely to increase corporate profits. If Comcast were truly worried about Cable Hogs saturating nodes they would do something about the thousands of spam bots they nurture.

So, Rick, it seems that your position as the #1 Comcast shill could be in jeopardy, since even shills need factual backup. You evidently have none. But please keep up the entertaining posts. We all laugh at you every time we see one.

Love,
RadioDoc
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
said by Rick:

has simply decided to move onto something else.

Well..that dog won't hunt. And neither will I. And so i'll bow out graciously from any further replies to his posts which seem to morph into something else entirely once he receives a direct response to his original question.
For a dog that won't hunt, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into it.

Sorry, but my decision to go to DSL was great considering I can use my connection the way I want to and it is cheaper to boot.

As for the other tripe you were spilling about Verizon being late to the party, isn't Comcast a little late entering the phone business?

As for my friends, none work for or have any interests in the telco business.

Now go back and keep saying to yourself, "DOCSIS 3 is coming, DOCSIS 3 is coming."

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

"For a dog that won't hunt, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into it."

And, for an isp that you don't even have..you seem to be putting an amazing amount of time into this.

I'd certainly have to classify my posts as much more appropriate given that I do actually have the service than your's who has simply decided to troll my posts.

In any event..enjoy your service and the "savings" it gives you.

As for me however, I think i'll pass on it.

I'm not interested in saving a very few bucks and cutting 19Mb off my speeds.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

Re: IMHO..

said by Rick:

"For a dog that won't hunt, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into it."

And, for an isp that you don't even have..you seem to be putting an amazing amount of time into this.

I'd certainly have to classify my posts as much more appropriate given that I do actually have the service than your's who has simply decided to troll my posts.

In any event..enjoy your service and the "savings" it gives you.

As for me however, I think i'll pass on it.

I'm not interested in saving a very few bucks and cutting 19Mb off my speeds.
Just keep saying to yourself, "DOCSIS 3 is coming, DOCSIS 3 is coming." That will not solve all your problems. If Comcast or any other high speed ISP wants more subscribers, they are going to have to deal with needing extra capacity. Without it, they will bring up how all these services are degrading the network. Today it's P2P, tomorrow it could be VOIP or video on demand services like Netflix and Apple TV. Think it would be received well if they start forging packets on those services?

Sorry, no troll here. My argument is and has always been that once an ISP starts degrading a service, then it becomes a very slippery slope. Degrade the wrong service and watch as lawmakers start writing laws that prevent ISPs from playing favorites.

Sorry, no trolling here. My whole side of the argument is the forging of packets by Comcast.

Rick
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT

Re: IMHO..

Honestly, I don't think you could be any more mistaken.
Comcast is a company that has proven themselves time and time again the last decade first by spending billions on their fiber rollouts and secondly..with everything else they've done to improve and innovate.

We're talking about a company here that just this year has taken me as a cable subscriber from the approximately 4Mb speeds I was seeing..to over 20Mb now with powerboost.

And..a company that has in a very short amount of time..now built what is the nations 4th largest phone company.

From scratch.

As for Docsis 3.0..there is absolutely nothing in Comcasts recent past to suggest that it won't be here soon..and in the quantities and numbers spoken several times in the last few months by none other than their own CEO.

Comcast..is DOING..what companies like AT&T can only dream about.

Is it perfect? Absolutely not. Are there some unhappy customers? Absolutely.

But..looking at them as a company..and as a whole..it's hard to see anything except a company that is dramatically innovating. A company that is really going places..and providing some outstanding service and products to their customers.

I'd suggest that if you're really looking for a company that isn't doing that..that you look no further than AT&T.
Now there is a company with a decade of nothing but missteps beneath them. A company refusing to spend the money to do the job that needs to be done. A company that delivers such inconsistent service across the board..that it's almost mind numbing how they even remain in business. A company of maybe you can get it..maybe you can't. Maybe it'll be 768k..maybe 1.5Mb..don't forget the overhead..and don't even try to think too hard about that old copper they hope to deliver hdtv..voice and hsi on. Now that is a company that really needs the work.

But..instead..you find fault with this one. The company giving me and most others 20Mb + speeds..for a fraction of the price of what it would cost at&t to do the same..if they even could. AT&T's service is a dog compared to this.

I'm sorry to have to say it so bluntly..but the facts are a fact. And if they won't change it.then i'll keep on saying it.

But..feel free to criticize Comcast if you must.

Why on Earth you see fit to do so however...is really beyond me.

We..their customers..WANT them to protect our network from abuse. And, if that impacts the 4% of customers who don't see it that way..then so be it. Comcast should cut them off..or shut them down. If they can't play by the very fair rules..they don't get to play at all.

And it's exactly how it should be.

Enjoy your service.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

Re: IMHO..

You know, if you have to defend your side that hard, it must not have that much behind it.

Face it, Powerboost is not the end all be all and you never answered the question as to why I only got it part time.

The more you pull the company line, the more your credibility shrinks because an employee touting his own service is expected. A customer who doesn't work for the company is a way better judge because they have nothing to lose if the company goes south.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Why do you continue to evade the actual questions and instead spew PR swill?

I defy you to find a 20 megabit Comcast connection for $42.95 that is not some limited promo price or in a market where they are running for their lives (see: Utopia an FIOS). What is the total cost of that when you add in the required cable service? How much is it "dry"?

But as a practical matter how often are you using that 20 megabit download speed? This is a serious question. 10% of the time? 1%? 0.1%? Isn't it just a marketing gimmick like "Powerboost"?

I have 6016/768 for $40 and that includes the phone line. I have yet to see a comparable Comcast plan at that price point.

Another question for you: Why do you call p2p "illegal" when there are increasing numbers of legitimate uses for the technology, not the least of which are things like Octoshape and distribution of Internet appliances by established, respected companies like VMWare. These are hardly illegal and are the wave of the future. A future Comcast is terrified of and is doing whatever it can to beat it back before its core business starts going down the drain. You love to bash AT&T. Well, Comcast is starting to do the same anti-competitive things the "old" AT&T was broken up over. Maybe it's time to shine the anti-trust light towards Philly.

And we're still waiting for justification of breaking established TCP/IP protocol merely for profit.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

2 edits
said by Rick:

Comcast has always said they use reasonable network management practices and has never said that their service is unlimited.
1. "Reasonable network management" was a phrase invented in the FCC policy hearings on Network Neutrality in 2005. The phrase is in the FCC policy statement. Comcast did not start using the phrase at all until October 2007. They didn't need to, the issue had not come up.

2. Comcast has advertised their service is unlimited. Would someone please bookmark this page or put it in the Comcast FAQ or something? I'm sick of this argument. They have advertised it as Unlimited. They simply stopped advertising it as unlimited at some point. It has only been in the past 3 years or so that they publicly acknowledged some kind of invisible limit.



Comcast's Site - June 2001



A Comcast Reseller Site - Same Ad Text - Today

(link)

--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon USA
Are you affected by Comcast's RST forging? How to test it! -or- Read my original report.

See 7 replies to this post
gateguy
Premium
join:2001-02-12
Reisterstown, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
Here here, well said and all that sort of crap.

Comcast should get rid of the bandwidth hogs BUT they should also stop oversubscribing their service too.

Can't always blame it on the hogs when everyone gets on the internet during the super bowl halftime and cant get more than 50Kbps...

Cuts both ways.
--
Without data, it is just an opinion

BabyBear
Keep wise ...with Nite-Owl

join:2007-01-11

1 edit
said by Rick:

BBR should STOP promoting their interests
(Finally gets up off the floor from laughing so hard) Ahhh, Its good to see you around again Rick. Nice to see all the comedy writers aren't on strike.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
What a load of tripe.

Interference in interstate commerce and secretly violating established networking standards in order to save a few bucks on operations (although all this P2P traffic does not seem to be hurting their bottom line any) is bad enough, but endorsing it as some sort of customer-benevolent "feature" is positively absurd.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.
NGOwner

join:2000-11-21
Leawood, KS
Reviews:
·PHONE POWER

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

said by RadioDoc:

What a load of tripe.
Eloquent rebuttal. Insightful (or more like inciteful) comment. Way to contribute to the discussion. Kudos.

said by RadioDoc:

Interference in interstate commerce
Come again? How exactly is commerce being interfered with? Legitimate commerce completes, maybe at a slower pace, but it does complete. And let's not forget that most of what being "interfered" with (managed is such a better word for what's being done) can't be considered "commerce" even in the most liberal sense of the word.

said by RadioDoc:

secretly violating established networking standards
Hardly secret and hardly a violation. TOS/AUP states Comcast can manage the network as Comcast sees fit. Conspicuously absent from Comcast's TOS/AUP is the phrase stating Comcast will permit RadioDoc to manage Comcast's network as RadioDoc sees fit.

I absolutely agree with Rick. But sadly, our viewpoint faces a daunting uphill battle in an arena such as BBReports. The audience here is far too skewed in the direction of excessive (or heavy if you prefer) bandwidth usage to be representative/indicative of Comcast's users as a whole.

[NG]Owner
--
It is impossible to create an idiot-proof product. Humanity is simply too adept at churning out better idiots.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

4 edits

Re: IMHO..

TCP/IP another other protocol standards guy. Comcast's TOS/AUP doesn't determine how TCP transport works. And yes, Comcast denied it, denied it, denied it until the AP and NYT published stories about it. Then the corporate spin machine went into high gear along with their shill defenders.

And yeah, endless shilling for the telco and cable industry will face an uphill battle from those looking to protect the integrity of the internet from lying and corrupt profiteers like Comcast.

Whether it's forging packets, DNS redirection or content interception and ad insertion in violation of copyright law or any of the other violations of internet standards that BREAK device and program functionality, yes, the shills who defend these practices will be argued with.

Pardon us for choosing protocol integrity over ever increasing cable industry profits, fraud and anticompetitive behavior.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Tripe: It is a load of tripe. Should I have called it a pile of crap instead? Maybe a heap of horse droppings? A pit of putrid pus?

Interstate commerce: There are an increasing number of "legitimate" products distributed via P2P methods. One of them I just ran across is a game for the Mac which is part of a bundle sold at a discount, but you have to download the 500+ megabyte file. One of the options is Bittorrent. Even slowing of legitimate commerce is interference, and is probably illegal interference. As you have no idea what does and does not "complete" in these cases I doubt you have any facts to back that up.

But, playing along, lets say that instead of the download taking fifteen minutes at an average data rate of five megabits per second it takes three hours because of all of the disconnects and re-seeks. Keep in mind that Comcast has their own game download store this competes with and faces no such restrictions. How much "management" do you thing the average legitimate, paying customer is going to put up with?

Replace "game service" with "movie service", which competes with Video on Demand, and you can see where this is a very ugly scenario, one which needs to be addressed immediately.

Secrets: Are you seriously proposing that hacking established network protocols in the name of increased profits (and for no other reason whatsoever) is a good thing? Especially when it restricts legitimate trade? Really?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: IMHO..

RadioDoc See Profile, arguing with industry shills is pointless. No matter what Comcast does, they will always worship at the feet of Brian Roberts. They certainly don't believe a word of what their posting, they're just cut and pasting the company line.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: IMHO..

Yeah I know. Just could not let that attack go unanswered.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

jimbo48

join:2000-11-17
Hayward, CA
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
Tell you what- I suffered 6 rate hikes in less than a year from Comcast and saw absolutely NOTHING in return just a bigger bill and finally dumped them. They justified their rate hikes were needed to provide "Additional " enhanced services yet they haven't done a lick of work in my locale in over 10 years.What they did was upgrade a small portion of a low-income area that couldn't afford their inflated product offering to begin with to satisfy their monopoly with the city. They're still using the same outdated wiring from 10-12 years ago. They keep their TOS nebulous so that they can do whatever they want and still conform to their TOS. Their customer service is rude and uncaring the service support is un-responding. It may be different in your area but I relate my own experience so that is the reality for me. I don't want to paint with too broad a brush but what Comcast is doing is not ethical. They advertise and offer "unlimited" service and performance for a price then apply their definition of unlimited and performance (in mouseprint BTW) to mean whatever they want it to be. If they are so generous and forthright, let these "generous" capacities be put into a legal TOS document that they have to abide by as well as the consumer. LMAO it will never happen because they will then have to do what they agreed to.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
said by Rick:

We need to move on from this issue.

Those who this is ultimately affecting are the extreme..way over the top users who feel that they have the right to everything and anything for one low price.

As opposed to the industry shills that will excuse everything cable and telcos do.
SilverSurfer1

join:2007-08-19
said by Rick:

We need to move on from this issue.

Those who this is ultimately affecting are the extreme..way over the top users who feel that they have the right to everything and anything for one low price.
And this is a fact according to whom, exactly?

said by Rick:

I..and the vast majority of Comcast customers are very satisfied with our service and expect this company to do whatever it takes to preserve exactly that and to deliver a quality experience for the majority of us..not the minority.

Really Rick? Did you offer a survey or go knocking door-to-door to make that determination? How exactly did you arrive at the conclusion that the vast majority of Comcast subscribers are very satisfied?

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
Reviews:
·VOIPo
Forging packets is unacceptable. Just imagine when it starts affecting you, Rick. I bet you will sing a different song. Throttling and forging are two different things.

BBR is not promoting anything, more exposing what companies are doing. They have every right to do that just as you haev the right to come in and defend Comcast. What BBR suggests to work around Comcasts shaping is legal, so there is nothing wrong with it.

There certainly has to be a reason why Comcast keeps coming up in these types of discussions.
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org

pokesph
It Is Almost Fast
Premium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1

Re: IMHO..

said by ptrowski:

Forging packets is unacceptable. Just imagine when it starts affecting you, Rick. I bet you will sing a different song. Throttling and forging are two different things.
---cut---
Just remember, in some states it is criminally illegal for anyone to intercept, modify, and etc. internet data, packets, and so on. What Comcast is doing can get them in a bunch of legal trouble if, IF it can be proved in as court of law. There are a few trying that here in ArnoldLand.

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
Reviews:
·VOIPo

Re: IMHO..

said by pokesph:

said by ptrowski:

Forging packets is unacceptable. Just imagine when it starts affecting you, Rick. I bet you will sing a different song. Throttling and forging are two different things.
---cut---
Just remember, in some states it is criminally illegal for anyone to intercept, modify, and etc. internet data, packets, and so on. What Comcast is doing can get them in a bunch of legal trouble if, IF it can be proved in as court of law. There are a few trying that here in ArnoldLand.
I remember that, thanks for the refresher pokesph. The question is who will have deep enough pockets to make the case?

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

1 edit

Re: IMHO..

Trial lawyers looking to make millions off getting this Class Action status.
jtorre69

join:2005-12-26
Hollywood, FL
Reviews:
·Comcast
Comcast should then start using the phrase "comcast limited internet service" because thats what it is.
Call it what it is Rick.
If it looks like a duck, talks like a duck, walks like a duck...............

The truth hurts you, but thats life!

Bandwidth hog

@comcast.net
Sure, if you buy the corporate line.

I downloaded World of Warcraft (yeah, yeah..) and if I turned off P2P, it was about 600kb/s. If I enabled it, as encouraged by various screens, it was about 60kb/s. You could see it start off in a burst then drop off dramatically. By toggling it back and forth, it went from a projected 45 hour download to about 6.

Did downloading that one program make me one of the evil bandwidth hogs you refer to? It WAS several GB, but a one-time thing.

It's not like Comcast doesn't already cap speeds, why not just cut it back to 1.5mb as it was with @home?
Of course that'd impact marketing, better to advertise service as what you won't deliver for more than 30 seconds at a time than try selling it at it's actual speed.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: IMHO..

Shhh, you're making to much sense and that will only frustrate the industry shills who endlessly justify everything Comcast does.

It's obvious Comcast is incapable of delivering anything close to the speeds they advertise. They should only offer what they're capable of offering, and if that means rolling back speeds to 3Mb or 1.5Mb to do it, so be it.

What they're doing now is fraud. They're promising "crazy fast" speeds, fast downloads of movies, pictures and music, and offering nothing of the kind. You download too much, they call it "abuse" while refusing to clearly define abuse. You use torrents to legally download movies, games pictures or music and they violate internet protocol standards with packet forgings and traffic shape your connection into the ground.

It's time for the FTC to crack down on this fraud and force Comcast to be truthful in their advertising.

At 60KB/s, Comcast is neither fast, nor a value.

Tuesday, 29-May 14:32:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics