republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast: Metered Billing Is Not The Answer » Though...
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Does QOS really work?  
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Though...

You can always throw in QoS and weight the high bandwidth/large number of connections apps (i.e. P2P apps) at the bottom and let everything flow freely. That way you aren't shaped, bill-per-byte isn't needed as much, and everyone will be happy...except for the hogs that want to download the Internet via their P2P app and their "unlimited" residential connection. P2P apps would be able to roam freely during non-peak usage times such as early morning through midday.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Though...

said by openbox9 See Profile :

You can always throw in QoS and weight the high bandwidth/large number of connections apps (i.e. P2P apps) at the bottom and let everything flow freely. That way you aren't shaped, bill-per-byte isn't needed as much, and everyone will be happy...except for the hogs that want to download the Internet via their P2P app and their "unlimited" residential connection. P2P apps would be able to roam freely during non-peak usage times such as early morning through midday.
If TWC and Comcast did that, i'd be just fine. HTTP, -> FTP inbound -> SMTP -> NNTP -> P2P. The current Comcast forged packet stuff is indeed unnecessary when they could just use simple QoS rules...
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|-
Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -|
|- Ron Paul »www.ronpaul2008.com/ -|
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Though...

I agree. QoS is the future to keep a majority of customers happy. Of course the P2P users won't like it, but a majority of people would be happy that they're now able to surf, read e-mail, and upload their photos to Walmart without a problem.

If I were king for a day, I'd look at the most used services/protocols and then weight them higher. I'd also look at the most resource consuming services/protocols and weight them with the lowest priority. There may be a few services/protocols here and there outside of the basic model, but you can handle the exceptions on a case by case basis.

factchecker

@cox.net

said by tiger72 See Profile :

VoIP -> VPN -> HTTP/SMTP -> FTP inbound -> NNTP -> P2P.
Tweaked it for you... Basically you have your most important, time sensitive apps at the top and the less sensitive traffic at the bottom.

If providers would do that across the board, without charging anyone extra (ie charging Vonage, etc. more for that higher QoS), I'd have no problems with it, so long as the providers realize that QoS only saves you for only so long before you have to upgrade.

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


1 edit

Re: Though...

quote:
VoIP -> Gaming Packets -> VPN -> ssh-> HTTP/SMTP -> FTP inbound -> "Other" (IM/videochat/VNC/etc)-> NNTP -> P2P.
Some additions(and I'm not a big online gamer by any stretch).
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
All of the Ellacoya/Sandvine/Ciscos can do that easily, prioritize a certain protocol lower, but no, Comcast can't be satisfied with that, they need to ELIMINATE the traffic.

LeftOfSanity

join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE

Re: Though...

said by patcat88 See Profile :

All of the Ellacoya/Sandvine/Ciscos can do that easily, prioritize a certain protocol lower, but no, Comcast can't be satisfied with that, they need to ELIMINATE the traffic.
From what I understand, they aren't eliminating it. The resets just delay it.
Forums » Comcast: Metered Billing Is Not The Answer« Does QOS really work?  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 00:56:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [193] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [49] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [20] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3.0 (12-08-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· SB6120 Firmware update [Comcast HSI]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· Unexpected network packet storms [Wireless Service Providers]