What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19963363 en Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:42:52 EDT Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:42:52 EDT Re: What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19968450 jay_rm : There WAS a guy all lined up and waiting - Frontline.

EVERYBODY figured they would be the one that would bid, win and team up to build out the network. NOBODY else was willing to bid as the industry figured it was a setup, with Frontline sure to win (all though, they'd still need to meet the minimum bid). Frontine was all ready working behind the scenes with the PSST (Public Safety Spectrum Trust - the 'overseers' of the D block).

Uh-Oh - right before the auction was to start, Frontline closed the doors and went out of business because they couldn't raise the cash to bid (probably couldn't raise the FCC deposit money). That caught EVERYONE off guard - industry, the FCC, everybody. Since there was nobody READY to bid on D-block, the spectrum got one feeble bid in the opening rounds (30% of minimum) and nothing else.

The FCC knew it was screwed the second Frontline folded but it was too late to do anything about it. After the auction is over, the rules will be tweaked, new cages will be rattled, more back room deals will close and there will be a NEW AUCTION, with the same basic commercial+public safety sharing agreement that WILL be successful and D-band will slowly be built into "some sort" of PS-friendly sharing network covering 90%+ of the US population.

My long term guess is that PUBLIC SAFETY themselves will baulk at using it...
--
3500/512 5.7 GHz Motorola Canopy Wireless; FoxValley.net
"Peace through superior firepower"]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19968450 Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:35:12 EDT Re: What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19967876 Ahrenl : Ummm.. 100's of trillions is greater than the entire world's GDP. Bush's new budget calls for $3 trillion. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19967876 Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:22:14 EDT Re: What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19967688 grumpy3b : dude...you think we run the US on hundreds of billions? Must be the new math...but you are off by at least a couple orders of magnitude....try 100's of TRILLIONS in taxes when you total all collected taxes.
--
Using Millenicom? Come visit the Unoffical Millenicom forum here on BBR »Millenicom]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19967688 Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:09:59 EDT Re: What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963614 Dogfather : ]Why should they? The gov't really needs charity? They're already taking in hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of billions in taxes. They don't need anyone's charity.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963614 Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:31:10 EDT What more proof you need to show that noone is interested? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963363 barn25 : It seems that no one cares(in the corporate world) to try and help others...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19963363 Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:43:00 EDT