republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [Config] 871 & 12.4(15)T3 DebugsON ?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1859
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Config] Firewall config or virus/spyware? »
« [H/W] 7609 & WS-X6724-SFP - Resolved  
AuthorAll Replies

Euphrates

join:2007-04-30
Bellingham, WA

reply to Euphrates
Re: [Config] 871 & 12.4(15)T3 DebugsON ?

Nope, it didn't seem to work. When I boot up, I get the following:

no debug dot11 syslog
-----^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

I had the command configured like so:

!
no debug dot11 syslog
!
end

I added the (!) to separate this test command from my normal configs.

***Note***

Because of the way posts are formated, I had to add the (-) in there up to the point that it shows the (^).

Euphrates

join:2007-04-30
Bellingham, WA

reply to mazzy
Sorry to resurrect this thread but I'm coming across the same problem with debugs. I'm running 12.4(15)T4 Advanced IP Services. I'm noticing the same problem with dot11 debugs being enabled by default at boot. I tried the "no debug dot11 syslog" command a a reload but it seems to start on it's own at boot. I'm thinking I will have to create a config with that command in it at the end of the config string and see if that disables dot11 syslog debugging at the moment the startup config is pulled into running config. I will let you all know how it goes...unless someone has already come up with a solution to this issue.


MSN

join:2004-05-15
Osgoode, ON
reply to mr_dirt
You're welcome.

Also, I'm running 384 signatures.

/Eric

mr_dirt

join:2006-02-14
Denver, CO
reply to MSN
Thanks for the details.


MSN

join:2004-05-15
Osgoode, ON

reply to mr_dirt
I'm running the complete "basic" list per the SDM's recommendations. Since the 871 only has 128 MB RAM, the advanced list will cause memory faults when traffic is high.

That said, I've only disabled two signatures. Cisco recently announced a TTL vulnerability in their IOS and two of the signatures matched against this type of DoS attack. I was getting too many false positives (mainly from UPnP and dynamic routing protocol...basically IP multicast) so I turned 'em off.

As I said in my 1st post, what impresses me most is that througput doesn't seem to be affected in the least with the IPS engines (13 of them) all turned on.

/Eric

mr_dirt

join:2006-02-14
Denver, CO

reply to MSN
said by MSN See Profile :

I'm also using ZBF (Zone-Based firewall). I'm impressed and a bit surprised.

So, what are you impressed and surprised at? Performance?

Are you running the complete sig list?

mash_man

join:2004-08-16
1602HC
reply to jrpavel3
You are correct,

Dot11 debugging is enabled by default.

jrpavel3

join:2002-03-16
UK
reply to MSN
If you show cpu history, you will see how hard your router is working

jrpavel3

join:2002-03-16
UK
reply to mazzy
I think that it may be the wireless that has some debugging switched on.

Try show debugging?


MSN

join:2004-05-15
Osgoode, ON

reply to TROLL131313
Coincidentally, I'm testing my new 871 with 12.4(15)T3 and with IPS turned on both outbound and inbound and I'm seeing absolutely no performance difference with IPS on vs. off.

Speedtest.net and speakeasy.net/speedtest both give me approximately 4200 kbps down and 600 kbps up on my ADSL connection regardless of whether IPS is scanning the packets or not. I'm seeing all kinds of detailed IPS messages in my syslog as it's doing its thing too, so I know its working.

I'm also using ZBF (Zone-Based firewall). I'm impressed and a bit surprised.

/Eric

TROLL131313

join:2004-12-21
Horsham, PA
·Comcast

reply to mazzy
You are correct on the boot-up debug. IOS has to do this since it spits out info on the remote port on start up.

Have you tried the IPS migration wizard in SDM yet? It seems to work and it will even download the latest V5 signature pkg from cisco and convert them.

Overall the performance seems better now with IPS, tho time will tell.


mazzy

@net24.it

Hi, I've installed the new IOS & latest SDM 2.5
After loading SDM, an alert message pop-up about enable debugs, recommend to disable it for better performance.
I go in CLI: no debug all or undebug all.
I get reply that all the debug info are disabled, reload SDM and I get no more warning, but after a reload of the router if I relaunch SDM I'll get the same pop-up message.
so I think that the IOS image enable some debugs at the boot.
I was running the 12.4(9)T6 before but I'd like to check the status of IPS with the latest release, maybe it's no the right time to do it.
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco[Config] Firewall config or virus/spyware? »
« [H/W] 7609 & WS-X6724-SFP - Resolved  


Sunday, 06-Dec 12:17:53 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [135] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· Bulb for garage door opener [Home Repair & Improvement]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents [Canadian Chat]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]