site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

reply to texans20

Re: Not Allowed

said by texans20:

I've found that the WM 5 and WM 6 devices work with Exchange much better than the BlackBerrys.
... then you don't know what you're doing. A Blackberry with BES will blow a WM device out of the water and use a crapload less on-air data to boot. Any organization that is serious about how their BBs are used will have their own BES server.
--
I swear that I will faithfully and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.


rpeAMP

join:2000-12-02
San Antonio, TX

said by Snickerdo:

said by texans20:

I've found that the WM 5 and WM 6 devices work with Exchange much better than the BlackBerrys.
... then you don't know what you're doing. A Blackberry with BES will blow a WM device out of the water and use a crapload less on-air data to boot. Any organization that is serious about how their BBs are used will have their own BES server.
Completely agree.


nil
Java Geek
join:2000-11-27
kudos:1

reply to Snickerdo
Agreed.. used WM device for a couple of years, the bb is much better and nicer to use.
--
Life is too short to be boring


yahtzee
Premium
join:2000-12-03
Richmond, VA

reply to Snickerdo

said by Snickerdo:

said by texans20:

I've found that the WM 5 and WM 6 devices work with Exchange much better than the BlackBerrys.
... then you don't know what you're doing. A Blackberry with BES will blow a WM device out of the water and use a crapload less on-air data to boot. Any organization that is serious about how their BBs are used will have their own BES server.
+1


texans20
Premium
join:2002-09-28
Texas!

reply to Snickerdo

said by Snickerdo:

said by texans20:

I've found that the WM 5 and WM 6 devices work with Exchange much better than the BlackBerrys.
... then you don't know what you're doing. A Blackberry with BES will blow a WM device out of the water and use a crapload less on-air data to boot. Any organization that is serious about how their BBs are used will have their own BES server.
Can't afford BES, our budget per year for equipment and IT software is less than $20,000, we support 155 users. Most of that is spent buying new hardware, and anti-virus licenses for each machine come from our budget. The WM devices work with no additional software to purchase. BES might be fantastic, it sure looks like it, but on our razor thin budget we have to go with what's already there.

I guess the experience depends on the mobile devices. Most of our users are on WM Smartphone Edition, and while the interface might not be as good as a BlackBerry that's not my problem. I do use WM6 and it's a big improvement as far as reliability, and WM6.1 due out this summer looks stunning, so the interface is catching up. I've had a WM5 Q and a WM6 Q9, the Q9 is extraordinary and works great with our E2k7 setup.
--
"I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies." Thomas Jefferson


Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

said by texans20:

Can't afford BES, our budget per year for equipment and IT software is less than $20,000, we support 155 users. Most of that is spent buying new hardware, and anti-virus licenses for each machine come from our budget. The WM devices work with no additional software to purchase. BES might be fantastic, it sure looks like it, but on our razor thin budget we have to go with what's already there.
If you're paying per meg for data access on the cell network, the amount of bandwidth saved by switching from WM to BB on BES alone will justify the cost, and even then there are companies that specialize in hosting BES for smaller organizations... though, 155 people is hardly small. The company I work for maintains dedicated BES installations for as little as 30 users. You guys are either really cheap, or don't understand just how much more useful BES is.
--
I swear that I will faithfully and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to Snickerdo
How about we have 12. About 90 % of the users are affected by the RIM outage.

My Moto Q is unaffected and my lg voyager is unaffected by the outage. While I like the BES servers ( so easy to maintain except all the queue stall traps ) Exchange users are still purring along because it doesn't all go through RIM.

I think compressing messages and sending them compressed to hand helds to decompress would give us the same bandwidth savings as the bb.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"



Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

said by BosstonesOwn:

I think compressing messages and sending them compressed to hand helds to decompress would give us the same bandwidth savings as the bb.
That's what a Blackberry and BES does, whereas a WM device just connects to OMA through SSL and pulls the data from there. WM and Mobile ActiveSync isn't exactly a very elegant solution.
--
I swear that I will faithfully and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA

Yeah i know , thats why I posted it.

I was thinking about it for WM devices. Which would give the same bandwidth savings.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"


bradleym

join:2002-08-05
Peoria, IL

reply to texans20
The small biz version of BES is free for your first device, and the CALs (up to 15, I believe) are less than $100 each. Best of all, the software will run on a workstation-class machine.


Tuesday, 29-May 22:41:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics