gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
| reply to Sammer
Re: Scary
Fearmongering, what a quaint strategy.
The real reason is the studios are afraid that people will be able to use the devices to access their premium content like ... NASCAR Total Access where they charge 10 bucks a month or whatever to be able to get different viewing angles and access to the in car cameras. And lots of SPAM.
So basically they want the spectrum, and anyone else who wants to utilize it is unwelcome competition.
--
‘Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,
Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,
With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will
We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.’
Solon |
|
Thespis
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Premium
join:2004-08-03
Keller, TX
| said by gaforces  :Fearmongering, what a quaint strategy. The real reason is the studios are afraid that people will be able to use the devices to access their premium content like ... NASCAR Total Access where they charge 10 bucks a month or whatever to be able to get different viewing angles and access to the in car cameras. And lots of SPAM. So basically they want the spectrum, and anyone else who wants to utilize it is unwelcome competition. I believe that the reason the NAB is against use of whitespace is because broadcasters have millions of dollars invested in wireless equipment (cameras, communication systems, microphones, etc) that already use this spectrum. The wireless mics I currently have operate on this spectrum and would probably be subject to interference. If they're useless, it would cost me about $3000 to replace them. That's just 6 mics... |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to gaforces
Do you have anything to back that up?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
cornelius785
join:2006-10-26
Worcester, MA
| reply to Thespis
i highly doubt your microphones operate in that same spectrum as these 'white space' devices would mainly based on the fact that they could never get certification from the fcc to operate in the already used TV bands. my guess it that your microphones operate in an ISM band. plus the the white space devices should be aware that some small range of frequencies is being used and should not transmit in that range. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
2 edits | Wireless microphones are licensed as Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the TV bands. See 47 CFR 74.801-882.
Operating term here: Licensed.
Link to rules for your reference.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Thespis
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Premium
join:2004-08-03
Keller, TX
| reply to cornelius785
said by cornelius785 :i highly doubt your microphones operate in that same spectrum as these 'white space' devices would mainly based on the fact that they could never get certification from the fcc to operate in the already used TV bands. my guess it that your microphones operate in an ISM band. plus the the white space devices should be aware that some small range of frequencies is being used and should not transmit in that range. I highly doubt you have any idea what you're talking about... |
|
gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA | reply to Thespis
I haven't seen where the testing confirmed any interference.
If they do interfere with licensed spectrum, then they shouldn't be approved. |
|
gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
1 edit | reply to RadioDoc
One of the earlier threads on this subject had some info on a stadium that was using, or had plans to use the spectrum for premium event coverage.
Looks like most the broadcasters are using Sprint to broadcast ATM. They could probably save a bundle if they could do it themselves.
NFL has the Total Access, NASCAR has the TrackPass »www.nascar.com/trackpass/ |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| There is nothing there to validate your accusation of "fearmongering".
The users in that spectrum are licensed whether they are a broadcast TV station or Low Power Auxilliary Stations. This discussion conveniently omits that fact. This "white space" initiative is an attempt to grab spectrum without proper engineering justification.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
2 edits | Aren't the "white space" areas between the channels that TV stations have license for? |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | The white space areas are channels that have no local broadcast station licensed on them, but they are rarely completely unused. The TV channels themselves have no "spaces" between them.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
| So they were established as buffer channels to prevent bleed-over. The low power stations don't interfere, but these devices will?
I don't see why they cant share, which will win, broadcast hogs, or bandwidth hogs?  |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| There are no 'buffer channels'. The Low Power Auxiliary Stations are on assigned frequencies, have strict requirements for equipment performance and are licensed. They are also operated by professionals. That is a lot different than what has been proposed with these so-called "white space" devices.
It is not a matter of sharing. It is about preventing another CB debacle.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
