2 edits | reply to pokesph
Re: Traffic Shaping, Packet Forgery said by pokesph:Not in my state anyway: (bold's are mine) It's nice that you know how to research the Penal Code and all, but Comcrap's practice of throttling/spoofing is still occurring in the Golden State, virtually with impunity, nonetheless. Additionally, take notice in the Hart v. Comcast complaint, your Penal Code citation is not a cause of action. Guess you better notify Hart's legal counsel -the Lexington Law Group- that you found the magic law that will prohibit Comcast's practices. |
|
 pokesphIt Is Almost FastPremium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 | Yeah I saw that.. I hope his lawyer is up for the task.. and that the court recognizes it's own laws.. |
|
| said by pokesph:Yeah I saw that.. I hope his lawyer is up for the task.. and that the court recognizes it's own laws.. My point was that Comcast throttling/spoofing is occurring in California with impunity, and, despite your assertion to the contrary of, as well as a lawsuit brought by another individual, the Penal Code section you cited does not appear in Hart's complaint. |
|
