RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to xenophon
Re: What happened to 7.2Mbps?
Is that supposed to provide some kind of information?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
1 edit | reply to xenophon
Not a huge difference, especially given the volume of samples.
Those are typically mini browser phone-based stats
Datacard/Tethered are here
»/archive?cid=265
»/archive?cid=302
»/archive?cid=316
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
xenophon
join:2007-09-17 | reply to RadioDoc
»/mspeed?domains=1 |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to xenophon
You might want to talk 3G phones too, since ATT has data plans which allow tethering which works the same as a data card. You don't need the card if you can connect to your phone via Bluetooth or USB just about anytime you want.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
xenophon
join:2007-09-17 | reply to en102
Was talking data cards not phones. The voice numbers are obvious.
Doesn't matter who ATT considers competition, they are far behind the major players. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to xenophon
True, that Sprint may have a better datacard ratio than Verizon Wireless, however AT&T has ~70 million GSM/3G subs, Verizon Wireless has almost as many, and lower churn rate.
Sprint has ~40 million CDMA subs + ~15million iDEN subs + MVNO.
I don't think in general, AT&T/Verizon Wireless are all that 'worried', as they have a lot of corp contracts as well as a large number of subscribers. Currently, I don't think that AT&T or Verizon is heavily promoting its datacards. Sprint on the otherhand is promoting data.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
