site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

gower23528

join:2005-06-08
Weston, WV

reply to Jonbo298

Re: HowardForums found it first

Well the only thing Sprint can do now to compete is to charge less for an unlimited plan.


Alex G Bell

join:2002-07-02
Boston, MA

Yes, and they should. What is awful is that "extensions" pay the same $100.00 per month instead of "sharing" the "unlimited" minutes.
--
"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Alex G Bell:

Yes, and they should. What is awful is that "extensions" pay the same $100.00 per month instead of "sharing" the "unlimited" minutes.
Might as well just get 3 seperate accounts. Doesn't make sense. On the family share plan they don't charge an etxra $40-$50 for eac extra phone. they charge $10.

Currently family share plan is 75% more thna single $70 vs $40, additional line $10. So 3 lines on family plan is double single line. So logic dictates that unlimited family plan with 3 lines should be $200 not $300. Which even at $200 is crazy.

Tuesday, 29-May 19:11:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics