Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Intel To Throw $2 Billion At Xohm » Another Minority tech
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
No Need For Sprint Bashing »
« Money won't fix Sprint  
AuthorAll Replies

xenophon

join:2007-09-17
reply to DaveNJ
Re: Another Minority tech

LTE is more proprietary than WiMAX. LTE is about carrier control. WiMAX is more open and has a much better chance getting into consumer devices than LTE.

LTE will become a closed form of telcom communism. WiMAX is for the people.


DaveNJ
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
·Comcast
·Patriot Media

said by xenophon See Profile :

LTE is more proprietary than WiMAX. LTE is about carrier control. WiMAX is more open and has a much better chance getting into consumer devices than LTE.

LTE will become a closed form of telcom communism. WiMAX is for the people.
This is completely false. LTE and WiMax are transport methods. CDMA, GSM etc can all be open, its just the carriers choose to enforce carrier locks. Wimax is just a transport method, its no more locked, or unlocked then any other method.

EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA
reply to xenophon
This has to be the greatest misuse of the word "communism" ever made.

xenophon

join:2007-09-17
reply to DaveNJ
I'm talking more about the business model, not the technology. The technologies are both essentially OFDM. The carrier controlled business model of LTE is not as open as the WiMAX business model.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
Definately. The most locked today is the CDMA business model, followed by GSM and iDEN
--
Canada = Hollywood North

xenophon

join:2007-09-17
reply to EPS
Hehe.. I got carried away.


DaveNJ
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
·Comcast
·Patriot Media

reply to xenophon
said by xenophon See Profile :

I'm talking more about the business model, not the technology. The technologies are both essentially OFDM. The carrier controlled business model of LTE is not as open as the WiMAX business model.
Right. The transport method is completely independent of the business model. Hence Wimax is no more open, then any other wireless interface tech.
--
Merry Christmas.. Merry Christmas.. Merry Christmas..


xenophon

join:2007-09-17
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

I'll be more specific next time... the way WiMAX is being deployed is more open with less ability for carrier control. LTE will continue to be carrier controlled.

You can argue the semantics but the bottom line is that the WiMAX ecosystem is designed to be put onto any consumer device with no involvement of carriers, like WiFi. LTE is not heading down that path and will still likely have carriers in control.

I could see WiMAX on generic MP3 players, gps devices, PSP/gameboy, etc. The makers don't have to deal with the carriers. I don't see LTE on such devices (broadly) long term.


Quemann

@comcast.net

Personally, I am with WiMAX in terms of its openness, interoperability and other potentials. LTE is yet to be born and will be commercially available around 2015. On the other hand, WiMAX has got a big success in South Korea and was incorporatted into ITU standard last year. The future of LTE is uncertain now becasue it is yet to be born. What a silly idea that ATT&T and Verizon boast of unborn babies.

WiMAX or LTE, mobile carriers are to gradually lose their market muscle since convergence of telecom, media, entertainment and advertising industries into mobile multimedia is dynamically under way. Besides, Nokia's upstream initiative, based on GPS, mobile gaming and multimedia networking advantages, will choke mobie carriers'
product portfolio strategy. Google's OHA alliance and other mobile platforms will significantly weaken carriers' gatekeeper status. Technology affilication may set the future of corporate giants. AT&T and Verizon have got plenty of time until they may start deploying 4G networks and may switch from LTE to a newer 4G or whatsoever later on. And even SK Telecom, one of the two commercially successful WiMAX carriers, has already advanced into US territory in the name of Helio, waiting until a tipping point pops up. Rumors are Intel will pump $2 billion into the Sprint/Clearwire deal, but late last year SK Telecom offered a $5 billion investment to Sprint. It remains to be seen whether telecom oligarchy will last nd until when.
Forums » Intel To Throw $2 Billion At XohmNo Need For Sprint Bashing »
« Money won't fix Sprint  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 16:18:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [84] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [78] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· DK Weapon Upgrade [World of Warcraft]
· So I found a gold mine... [World of Warcraft]