Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Australia's $89 Million Porn Filter a Failure » Force Filtering?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
145
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
In the home parents, not government , is the filter. »
« Wow 89 mil.  
AuthorAll Replies


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

Force Filtering?

They thought that 25 million homes would use the system, only 29,000 did. (And I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that some of those 29,000 weren't multiple computers in the same house.) That means that only 0.116% of the target audience wound up actually interested enough to use the filter. So if only a tenth of one percent of your target audience actually is interested in porn filtering the logical step is to force filtering on 100% of users, right?
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar. Shooting For A Cause
Jason's Toolbox | PCQandA.com


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

said by Jason Levine See Profile :

They thought that 25 million homes would use the system, only 29,000 did. (And I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that some of those 29,000 weren't multiple computers in the same house.) That means that only 0.116% of the target audience wound up actually interested enough to use the filter. So if only a tenth of one percent of your target audience actually is interested in porn filtering the logical step is to force filtering on 100% of users, right?
We've got the tyranny of the minority in the U.S. as well. Stupidity knows no limits.
--
The Toll

Let's Go Flyers!

redleaf

join:2000-09-12
reply to Jason Levine
Considering that Australia's population doesn't even reach 25 million people I don't know how they thought they'd reach 25 million homes. Maybe they thought people would install it in their vacation homes too?

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

1 edit
wrong post replied to


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

reply to redleaf
Good point. Australia has an estimated population of 21.2 million people. Even giving them the benefit of the doubt that they meant that 25 million *PEOPLE* would be using this and not 25 million *HOMES* (two very different things), that's still about 118% expected usage. I've heard of some pretty optimistic usage expectations, but this takes the cake!
Forums » Australia's $89 Million Porn Filter a FailureIn the home parents, not government , is the filter. »
« Wow 89 mil.  


Saturday, 21-Nov 21:07:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [138] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [95] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [84] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [84] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [72] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [66] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· Hacking.....seriously, how easy is it to get hacked? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Cleaning rain gutters [Home Repair & Improvement]
· AT&T YAhoo Email Customers - servers are down.. [AT&T Midwest]
· transfer switch location/space limitation [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Delivered Teksavvy flyers today + TSI Billboard seen in KW [TekSavvy]
· Here's a chart comparing the top VoIP providers. Comments? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Town to photograph EVERY car that enters and leaves [Security]
· AT&T YAhoo Email Customers - servers are down.... [AT&T Southeast]