republican-creole
site Search:


Home Reviews Tools Forums FAQs Find Service ISP News Maps About  
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads

  
Forums >

AT&T Blocking Competitors in CT > MaBell

Search Topic:
 Uniqs:
180		 Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN

MaBell

This just gives MaBell a heads up as to where to install their Fiber networks, and the time needed to do so be fore the competition does.
to forum · permalink · 2008-02-20 12:38:55 ·


elios

join:2005-11-15
Springfield, MO

said by ctceo:

This just gives MaBell a heads up as to where to install their Fiber networks, and the time needed to do so be fore the competition does.
to bad Uvers is fail compared to real FTTP like FiOS or UTOPIA
to forum · permalink · 2008-02-20 13:11:08 ·


ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
Reviews:
·magicjack.com
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Midwest

reply to ctceo
UVerse is failing because they are too slow to deploy. They have permissions to deploy here in South Bend Indiana, and they haven't yet. It only takes a 3Meg Stream for Uverse to function properly unless you need HD, and have the eyesight to take advantage of it.

to forum · permalink · 2008-02-20 13:16:59 ·


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to elios

said by elios:

said by ctceo:

This just gives MaBell a heads up as to where to install their Fiber networks, and the time needed to do so be fore the competition does.
to bad Uvers is fail compared to real FTTP like FiOS or UTOPIA
UTOPIA look it up.
to forum · permalink · 2008-02-20 23:16:56 ·
Forums > AT&T Blocking Competitors in CT

Wednesday, 30-May 03:27:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics