<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Catagory Nomination in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20033093</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:05:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:05:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Catagory Nomination</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><b>MrMoody</b></A> : Agree, an "Adware" site would be a site that installs or distributes programs with intrusive ads in them.<br><br>I too would suggest a "Spammer" category be added, then we can finally death-penalty the sites of spammers.<br><small>--<br>The public is a poor business manager.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036451</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:16:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Catagory Nomination</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20033093</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/486895"><b>newview</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They have a generic category called "ADWARE" that can be used to categorize such sites. <br> </div>No, that category doesn't quite have the desired level of hatred that I'd like to convey.<br><small>--<br> <br>&Ouml;&iquest;&Ouml;<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/525xl">The Rules of Spam</a> | <A HREF="http://www.spamlaws.com/state/md.html">Maryland's <i>Newest</i> Anti-Spam Law</a><br>Where are we going? And what's with the hand basket?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20033093</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:59:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Catagory Nomination</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20032783</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  newview <A HREF="/useremail/u/486895"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I REALLY hope they have a "spamvertized" catagory. <br><br>I'd love to be able to input all those pill & penis sites.<br> </div>They have a generic category called "ADWARE" that can be used to categorize such sites. See here:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.opendns.com/community/domaintagging/?category_id=1" >www.opendns.com/community/domain&middot;&middot;&middot;ory_id=1</A><br><br>They already have over 1400 sites submitted in that category and waiting for votes to determine inclusion. So if you choose to use OpenDNS and select the "ADWARE" filter, it should refuse calls to resolve the DNS for sites that eventually get voted on. And that may be a weakness with this service. Who is going to look thru 1400 entries and take the time to vote on them?<br><br>Besides the phishing category, I may actually try that one.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20032783</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:05:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Catagory Nomination</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20032763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/486895"><b>newview</b></A> : I REALLY hope they have a "spamvertized" catagory. <br><br>I'd love to be able to input all those pill & penis sites.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20032763</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:02:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
