<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Speakeasy Speed Test with dual-WAN load-balancing router in Speakeasy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20035764</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:57:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:57:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Speakeasy Speed Test with dual-WAN load-balancing router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20040762</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : EDIMAX BR-624 aka BR-6624<br><br>Sorry, but I don't know enough to answer your question.  What kinds of applications have async routing issues?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20040762</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:12:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speakeasy Speed Test with dual-WAN load-balancing router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20039358</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/121311"><b>metrodust</b></A> : what router are you using?  i'm doing this right now with a linux box and 3 nics. how is this device handling the asyc routing?<br><small>--<br>When you are leaving.. heaven is a distance not a place. --Carissas Weird</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20039358</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:01:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speakeasy Speed Test with dual-WAN load-balancing router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035775</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Typo in the body of my posting:  should read dual-WAN.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035775</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:18:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Speakeasy Speed Test with dual-WAN load-balancing router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035764</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : In order to have redundant access to the internet for work, I recently installed a load-balancing dual-LAN router and added Speakeasy ADSL service (shared voice line).  Comcast had been dropping connections every few minutes and it took them three weeks to fix the problem; though several years ago, Speakeasy left me completely without internet access for two weeks while Covad and Verizon sorted things out (to state the matter diplomatically).<br><br>The load-balancing router cost about $300 --the company has a less-expensive consumer-oriented model too, but they said I would be happier with this one. In crisis mode without reliable internet access, I didn't have the time or the inclination to shop around, read reviews, and bone-up on the issues.  But so far I am quite pleased with the results.<br><br>If one ISP goes down, I can switch the traffic to the other port in a configuation screen in my browser. The router might even detect this situation itself and automatically switch over -- I have to read the manual carefully to find out. <br><br>There is also a speed boost. Or at least an apparent speed boost: are the Speakeasy tests reliable when a dual-WAN configuration is being used?<br><br>One WAN port is connected to Speakeasy/Covad ADSL (shared voice line) and the other is connected to Comcast cable broadband.  When the ADSL port is allocated 100% of the session traffic, Speakeasy is getting about 1,300kbps down. If the cable port is allocated 100% of the session traffic, Comcast gets between 11,000 and 17,000kbps down. If I allocate 25% of the sessions to ADSL and 75% to cable, download speeds frequently exceed 21,000kbps.<br><br>Regards]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035764</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:17:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
