<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20036014</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:50:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:50:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/902719"><b>evilghost</b></A> : Glad to help.  I do know that the 6086 <b>requires</b> a DHCP server for IP address assignment.  If there is no contactable DHCP server the phone will fail to associate to the AP and the HS@Home service.<br><br>If you need to troubleshoot some of the connectivity issues I static compiled tcpdump for Tomato mips arch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038382</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:15:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> : Thank you, I've never looked at Tomato.  I have DD-WRT on an old WRT54G in my upstairs office, I use it as a bridge. <br>I had the Buffalo reserve an address for the phone, and though I had QOS set up right.  Maybe it is time for me to sit down and play with this again.  I just got tired of the error codes.<br><small>--<br>Retaking our country one election at a time.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038352</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:12:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/902719"><b>evilghost</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  xrobertcmx <A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Are you using their Linksys or Dlink router?<br>I have the 6086, I bought it because I have no coverage in my new house, and cell phone coverage wasn't really a consideration when buying.<br>But I've never been able to get the phone to hold a conection with any router I've tried.  That includes a WRT54GX2, my current Buffalo WZR2-G300N, and the Verizon Provided Actiontec.  I've spent hours on the phone with T-Mobile and keep getting the same exact run around, and I've had the handset replaced once, and even bought the Samsung only to return it.<br>On the otherhand my Viatalk service is working wonderfully now that I have FIOS.<br> </div>I am using Tomato GNU/Linux 1.16 on a Buffalo WHR-G54S with QoS configured to always prio the phones.  I created a DHCP lease reservation based on MAC so both phones (wife's and mine) are configured with the same IANA reserved address.<br><br>I eventually disabled wireless on the WHR-G54S due to sporadic reboot as a result of specific wireless behavior and a buggy wl.o drive.  I am now using WAP54G as an AP which connects to the WHR-G54S.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038276</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:00:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038235</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413670"><b>xrobertcmx</b></A> : Are you using their Linksys or Dlink router?<br>I have the 6086, I bought it because I have no coverage in my new house, and cell phone coverage wasn't really a consideration when buying.<br>But I've never been able to get the phone to hold a conection with any router I've tried.  That includes a WRT54GX2, my current Buffalo WZR2-G300N, and the Verizon Provided Actiontec.  I've spent hours on the phone with T-Mobile and keep getting the same exact run around, and I've had the handset replaced once, and even bought the Samsung only to return it.<br>On the otherhand my Viatalk service is working wonderfully now that I have FIOS.<br><small>--<br>Retaking our country one election at a time.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20038235</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:55:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TK Junk Mail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  evilghost <A HREF="/useremail/u/902719"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  BuzzDar <A HREF="/useremail/u/1320277"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>Sounds like a good idea to me  But question is does it really work.<br> </div>I use their UMA service with a Nokia 6086, and yes, it really works.  Call audio fidelity over VOIP is similar to that of land-line and is superior to cellular.  Traffic utilization is minimal around 30 to 40 Kbps.  VOIP traffic appears to be routed over an IPSEC VPN tunnel.<br><br>I use QoS to give the UMA service the highest priority to ensure there is no jitter.<br><br>I am seriously considering their Talk@Home service.<br> </div>It sure looks like a good deal. Now if Verizon only offered something similar. But since it would cannibalize their landline business, I doubt they will offer it soon.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:03:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1368015"><b>rupa</b></A> : I'd just on it right away if they offered the fancy call routing features callvantage offers.  Call 1 number and get all cell phones on the family plan to ring at once.  Until then, no go.<br><br>I'd use grandjunction but I'd have to control outgoing CID to be the grand junction # otherwise people just return the phone call on the cell # and then I don't get the house phone to ring...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20036008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:02:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035938</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/902719"><b>evilghost</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BuzzDar <A HREF="/useremail/u/1320277"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Sounds like a good idea to me  But question is does it really work.<br> </div>I use their UMA service with a Nokia 6086, and yes, it really works.  Call audio fidelity over VOIP is similar to that of land-line and is superior to cellular.  Traffic utilization is minimal around 30 to 40 Kbps.  VOIP traffic appears to be routed over an IPSEC VPN tunnel.<br><br>I use QoS to give the UMA service the highest priority to ensure there is no jitter.<br><br>I am seriously considering their Talk@Home service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035938</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:50:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sounds Like a Good Idea TO Me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035727</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1320277"><b>BuzzDar</b></A> : Sounds like a good idea to me  But question is does it really work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20035727</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:09:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
