site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2210
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


bear73
Metnav... Fly The Unfriendly Skies
Premium
join:2001-06-09
Grand Forks Afb, ND

reply to Karl Bode

Re: Negligible

said by Karl Bode:

We can charge them a privacy recovery fee and sign them up to a long term contract that lets them pay off the rest.
HA!!!! lmao
--
If ya gotta go, Go with a SMILE!
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Reviews:
·magicjack.com

reply to bear73

said by bear73:

Repeal Patriot Act and similar fear-monger laws?
I'm ok with that. But, until then, it seems like fear mongering itself to say AT&T "clearly violated the law" when there are laws that clearly would cover the activity.

It's this kind of mentality which causes me to understand AT&T's desire for immunity.

Mark


81399672
Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2

said by amigo_boy:

said by bear73:

Repeal Patriot Act and similar fear-monger laws?
I'm ok with that. But, until then, it seems like fear mongering itself to say AT&T "clearly violated the law" when there are laws that clearly would cover the activity.

It's this kind of mentality which causes me to understand AT&T's desire for immunity.

Mark
Please tell me which law protects at&t when they violated the law?


bear73
Metnav... Fly The Unfriendly Skies
Premium
join:2001-06-09
Grand Forks Afb, ND

reply to fAcEtIOUs
maybe so... but who DOES have $10 trillion. The gov't sure he11 doesn't. I doubt any nation has that much. not truly.
--
If ya gotta go, Go with a SMILE!
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/



vaxvms
ferroequine fan
Premium
join:2005-03-01
Wustah, MA
Reviews:
·Charter

reply to 81399672

said by 81399672:

Please tell me which law protects at&t when they violated the law?
AT&T hasn't been proven guilty of violating any law. Not yet.
--
Don't believe everything you think.

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Reviews:
·magicjack.com

reply to 81399672

said by 81399672:

Please tell me which law protects at&t when they violated the law?
See 3-4 posts up the thread.

Mark

tkdslr

join:2004-04-24
Pompano Beach, FL
Reviews:
·Speakeasy

reply to Karl Bode

Re: Negligible

said by Karl Bode:

As of the BellSouth merger they had 70 million landline customers...I assume they've lost a few million off of that total, but I'm not sure it's 30 million?

Still, yeah, with 70 million x $140,000 = $10 trillion?
I'm fairly sure BS merger occured after the lawsuits were filed, and the FISA court oversight was re-established.

Howevere the BS/AT&T merger adds additional assets to the pot to be distributed to plantiffs.


GuiltIsImplied

@frontiernet.net

reply to vaxvms

Re: Negligible

Of course they haven't been proven guilty. But use common sense here! They know they're guilty as hell or they wouldn't be screaming bloody murder for not getting retro immunity. If they did nothing wrong what immunity would they need? Is this really that hard to understand??? Why isn't THIS FACT part of the discussion? Everyone talks about whether or not they should get. When the real question is WHY DO THEY FEEL THEY NEED IT??????

Wednesday, 30-May 03:36:38 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics