<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Ah terrific, another study in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20043633</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:17:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:17:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Ah terrific, another study</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20043709</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  djrobx <A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>   <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>according to the group, just a 7% spike in broadband adoption would save $6.4 billion in vehicle mileage, and $662 million in health-care costs ($217 per person). <hr></blockquote><br><br>And how have they determined that those 7% who "adopt" broadband are going to do something other than play FPS shooters and watch porn on their new connections?  Not that there's anything wrong with either of those things!<br><br>Telecommuting is great, but very few companies actually allow it.  And broadband has great potential for productivity, but it simply won't alter everyone's lives in such a staggering manner.  Some, like me, depend on it for work, but for a large number of folks, it's simply a faster, more convenient form of internet access than dialup.<br><br> </div>I agree:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,20040143">Re: Wow</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20043709</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:07:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ah terrific, another study</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20043633</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :   <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>according to the group, just a 7% spike in broadband adoption would save $6.4 billion in vehicle mileage, and $662 million in health-care costs ($217 per person). <hr></blockquote><br>And how have they determined that those 7% who "adopt" broadband are going to do something other than play FPS shooters and watch porn on their new connections?  Not that there's anything wrong with either of those things!<br><br>Telecommuting is great, but very few companies actually allow it.  And broadband has great potential for productivity, but it simply won't alter everyone's lives in such a staggering manner.  Some, like me, depend on it for work, but for a large number of folks, it's simply a faster, more convenient form of internet access than dialup.<br><br>Maybe they should stop wasting so much money on these studies and use that cash towards getting actual connectivity to these underserviced areas.<br><small>--<br>Laser eye surgery rocks!  I love frickin' laser beams.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20043633</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:53:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
