gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
 ·Cruzio Internet
| reply to fiberguy
Re: Yep
It's not so much a change, as to be put back the way it was before Comcast opened the can-o-worms.
The FCC has stated it is committed to the 4 rules of Network Neutrality, which does not stop any network from reasonable network management.
--
Vista ~ Less functional every day! |
|
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| said by gaforces  :It's not so much a change, as to be put back the way it was before Comcast opened the can-o-worms. The FCC has stated it is committed to the 4 rules of Network Neutrality, which does not stop any network from reasonable network management. The problem is that the FCC refuses to define what is "reasonable network management" when they allow it. Unless/Until that definition is made, their rules are just a smoke screen for doing nothing about any actions that can be portrayed as violating Network Neutrality (something that they have also failed to define in their Rules). |
|
gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
edit:
February 23rd, @07:40PM
| I guess they might have a year to debate it 
--
Vista ~ Less functional every day! |
|
hottboiinnc
Kyle
join:2003-10-15
Toledo, OH | reply to RARPSL
How can one violate Network Neutrality when there isnt such a thing? |
|
