site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to Jovi

Re: Sad

said by Jovi:

said by caco:

It is a public meeting. Usually the only ones that ever go to these type of meeting are people to bitch about something. If your service is working fine than my guess they had no incentive to go to this meeting. Go to any city council meeting in any state and you will must likely see what am talking about. Kind of hard to have a fair meeting when all those attending in the crowd are active participantsone way or another.
So your saying that Comcast has a right to block people from speaking their mind in public hearing regardless? If the FCC actually spent time to set up a hearing, then it is pretty pointless to have a majority of a certain viewpoint represented. Comcast, as a single entity/corporation, is large enough to have a few individuals attend to speak for them.
Wise up. This is std practice for every politician running for office and all public meetings. Usually though, those clogging up public meetings are construction union workers and family members of the elected officials that push thru redevelopment projects in every township in America.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Jovi

join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by Jovi:

said by caco:

It is a public meeting. Usually the only ones that ever go to these type of meeting are people to bitch about something. If your service is working fine than my guess they had no incentive to go to this meeting. Go to any city council meeting in any state and you will must likely see what am talking about. Kind of hard to have a fair meeting when all those attending in the crowd are active participantsone way or another.
So your saying that Comcast has a right to block people from speaking their mind in public hearing regardless? If the FCC actually spent time to set up a hearing, then it is pretty pointless to have a majority of a certain viewpoint represented. Comcast, as a single entity/corporation, is large enough to have a few individuals attend to speak for them.
Wise up. This is std practice for every politician running for office and all public meetings. Usually though, those clogging up public meetings are construction union workers and family members of the elected officials that push thru redevelopment projects in every township in America.
I consider myself quite wise actually. Just because it's commonplace, doesn't make it right my friend.
--
"Where's my coffee? Oh. I guess it's my turn to make it."


Shack

join:2002-01-17
Bloomington, IN

Well said ethics are sorely lacking in American business and politics. Just because it is the norm, does not mean it is ok.



81399672
Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2

reply to fAcEtIOUs

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by Jovi:

said by caco:

It is a public meeting. Usually the only ones that ever go to these type of meeting are people to bitch about something. If your service is working fine than my guess they had no incentive to go to this meeting. Go to any city council meeting in any state and you will must likely see what am talking about. Kind of hard to have a fair meeting when all those attending in the crowd are active participantsone way or another.
So your saying that Comcast has a right to block people from speaking their mind in public hearing regardless? If the FCC actually spent time to set up a hearing, then it is pretty pointless to have a majority of a certain viewpoint represented. Comcast, as a single entity/corporation, is large enough to have a few individuals attend to speak for them.
Wise up. This is std practice for every politician running for office and all public meetings. Usually though, those clogging up public meetings are construction union workers and family members of the elected officials that push thru redevelopment projects in every township in America.
Compact paid them to be their. They hired them, this is not standard practice.


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

said by 81399672:

Comcast paid them to be there. They hired them, this is not standard practice.
No, it's not standard practice -- but is it "reasonable network management?"


TScheisskopf
World News Trust

join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ

reply to fAcEtIOUs
Having been to a few of those meetings myself, all I saw was developers and their lawyers, lying through their teeth all too often.

But I suppose if you see an opening to slam someone and something on idealogical grounds, why not take it, right?

You are quite predictable.



funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

said by TScheisskopf:

Having been to a few of those meetings myself, all I saw was developers and their lawyers, lying through their teeth all too often.
Since that's all you saw, perhaps you can give one specific example?
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
"We don't throttle any traffic," -Charlie Douglas, Comcast spokesman, on this report.


TScheisskopf
World News Trust

join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ

Sure. Right here where I live. A developer and his lawyer making all sorts of promises, like a new ladder truck for the fire department and a senior center for the town, while making wild accusations against the town attorney, a man of impeccable ethics.

He got all the approvals he needed, with an ease that was stunning. And the financing. Oh yes, the financing. He has not turned one shovel-full of earth or hammered one nail.

It was a big project too. No union members were seen for miles, at any time. For all the building that took place out here, until the market tanked, the unions were never an issue. In fact, you can probably make a better ideological aside about undocumented aliens, when talking about the building trades around here. Them developers sure do love them some undocumented aliens.

But we weren't talking about me, originally. Were we?



funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

reply to TScheisskopf

Re: Sad

Oh, No! Sorry. I was confused. I thought you were saying that "all I saw was developers and their lawyers, lying through their teeth all too often" at the FCC meeting.

I listened to the whole meeting, and what I heard didn't jive with what you said -- that's why I asked. I didn't mean to challenge you about anything other than the FCC meeting.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
"We don't throttle any traffic," -Charlie Douglas, Comcast spokesman, on this report.


TScheisskopf
World News Trust

join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ

Ok, Robb. No probs. I just wanted to make sure that you didn't think I was entering a dogfight with a Big Wheel.


Tuesday, 29-May 17:32:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics