cacoPremium
join:2005-03-10
Whittier, AK | reply to Jovi
Re: Sad All reports so far are saying that Comcast rep. was drilled pretty hard by FCC and Congressional representatives. Nowhere in any report does it say that the other side couldn't have done the same thing and we will never know because no one asked.
So you would have preferred a meeting filled with people from the other side that would have standing ovation every time someone made pointed remark about Comcast.
Rules don't change just because it is Comcast.
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil |
|
|
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| said by caco:... So you would have preferred a meeting filled with people from the other side that would have standing ovation every time someone made pointed remark about Comcast... I think MOST of us would have preferred a meeting that was not rigged by comcast.
and that's what they did - rig the meeting. for one to suggest that this is in any way appropriate behavior indicates they have suspect ethics or are awfully gullible.
yeah, others may do similar things, but as mentioned earlier, that doesn't make it right.
should be no question now - comcast is one of the evil corporations. |
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5
1 edit | reply to caco
said by caco:All reports so far are saying that Comcast rep. was drilled pretty hard by FCC and Congressional representatives. Nowhere in any report does it say that the other side couldn't have done the same thing and we will never know because no one asked. Bzzzt. Wrongo, bucko.
said by caco:So you would have preferred a meeting filled with people from the other side that would have standing ovation every time someone made pointed remark about Comcast. You obviously didn't attend or listen to the meeting audio. Quite frankly, the audience participation was quite polite. There was polite applause for all of the presenters (except for Comcast's presentation, which brought applause so abnormally loud it might have brought the house down).
Other than that, the audience basically let the meeting happen, with maybe 4-5 spontaneous bursts of applause throughout the day after a presenter (on either side) made a particularly popular point.
said by caco:Rules don't change just because it is Comcast. No, I don't suppose that they do. But it's good to get the facts out so that people can know how clean or slimy the company is behaving throughout this inquiry.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
"We don't throttle any traffic," -Charlie Douglas, Comcast spokesman, on this report. |
|
cacoPremium
join:2005-03-10
Whittier, AK | reply to nasadude
said by nasadude:said by caco:... So you would have preferred a meeting filled with people from the other side that would have standing ovation every time someone made pointed remark about Comcast... I think MOST of us would have preferred a meeting that was not rigged by comcast. and that's what they did - rig the meeting. for one to suggest that this is in any way appropriate behavior indicates they have suspect ethics or are awfully gullible. yeah, others may do similar things, but as mentioned earlier, that doesn't make it right. should be no question now - comcast is one of the evil corporations. How was the meeting rigged? The audience wasn't the ones asking the question.
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil |
|
| reply to nasadude
so is it wrong for a company to hold a few spots for there co workers. i would like to know how many people were payed to be there by comcast. if it was only two or three people no big deal. now if they filled half the room up with people they paid to be there, that is wrong. |
|
