Richard B
Fur It Up
join:2007-06-22
Portland, OR
 ·Comcast
edit:
February 26th, @08:31PM
| Dear Comcast Get a Backbone
o not understand why Comcast puts up with this crap. It is their network.If the A Democrat what pull the net socialism crap ten I would have a poison pill. If it was me:
If net Neutrality Laws are pass them immediately all broadband will be cap at 3Megs max. 2. It will not be in our interest to upgrade the connection. 3. we will pursue private upgrade options for customers willing to pay. If you the customer, do any thing than degrades the node,we will gladly refund your last payment, terminate all services, and send a technician to cut and remove the cable from your property.
Google can go to hell. If Google wants to complain we can have our lawyers make a contract to wave any liabilities and we can meet in any box gym or street conner to settle it like men. If you can knock me out you win or I going to wipe the floor with wiry whiny ass face send you back to your hole in an ambulance. The only way I will listen to Google if the CEO fights me. Heck we will put on UFC pay per view.
[see my reply] |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD | WTF?!?!?!?!!!??? |
|
MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T Southwest
| reply to Richard B
said by Richard B  :Google can go to hell. If Google wants to complain we can have our lawyers make a contract to wave any liabilities and we can meet in any box gym or street conner to settle it like men. If you can knock me out you win or I going to wipe the floor with wiry whiny ass face send you back to your hole in an ambulance. The only way I will listen to Google if the CEO fights me. Heck we will put on UFC pay per view. whoa lighten up on the steroids and testosterone supplements dude |
|
alalper
Premium
join:2000-08-20
Philadelphia, PA
| reply to nasadude
said by nasadude :WTF?!?!?!?!!!??? I wonder what he's been drinking/smoking.  |
|
number_one
join:2001-11-30
Midlothian, VA
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to Richard B
said by Richard B :o not understand why Comcast puts up with this crap. It is their network.If the A Democrat what pull the net socialism crap ten I would have a poison pill. If it was me: I'm not sure whether to tell you to stop taking drugs or take more of them... |
|
TScheisskopf
World News Trust
join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ | reply to Richard B
Re: Dear Comcast Get a Backbone
I take it you are a Comcast Executive who makes these policies? If not, then I predict you are gonna get your tail feathers singed. |
|
Richard B
Fur It Up
join:2007-06-22
Portland, OR
·Comcast
| reply to Richard B
The first three points I am dead serious. If the government want to try to regulated a private business. If Comcast is forced to treat all packets the same then the should do so at the lowest common denominator.
As for the last part it just my sarcastic self. It inside joke to about those who I so cheesed at, that the only way I would do something for them is they would have to fight me and win. I am a lager person. In this case Google. This whole government inquiry is about Google wanting to expand it business but does not want to spend dollars investing in infrastructure. Why invest in telecoms when you buy some lobbyist and activist to scram Net Neutrality.
Thats my story and I am sticking to it. |
|
tarrintoo
Premium
join:2006-08-20
Boca Raton, FL
|  Did you miss the part about public utility? Franchise monopoly? Cable companies trade their 'private business rights' for 'regulated business obligations' when they strike monopoly deals with the communities they serve. (or pillage, as the case may be) Just like phone companies and power companies, they may not choose their customers. In fact, even 'private businesses' that offer goods and services to the public, e.g. Cracker Barrel, may not turn away customers on a whim. And of course, Comcast isn't a 'private business' either: »finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CMCSA
I don't have strong opinions about traffic throttling one way or the other, but it's not hard to see that Comcast regularly abuses their customers, lies to the public, and exerts far to much influence on the political process. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercive_monopoly
Richard, aside from being troubled by english grammar and apparently quite hirsute, you don't seem to have very good grasp of capitalism, democracy, or the rule of law. Perhaps you should follow a few of these links. |
|
bent
not broken
Premium
join:2004-10-04
Longmont, CO
clubs:
·Comcast Formerly ..
| reply to Richard B
said by Richard B :This whole government inquiry is about Google wanting to expand it business but does not want to spend dollars investing in infrastructure. Why invest in telecoms when you buy some lobbyist and activist to scram Net Neutrality. Thats my story and I am sticking to it. Next article down:
Google At 7.68 Terabits Per Second
Search giant finalizes plan for Pacific fiber run
Thank you for your lucid, literate, and very informed thoughts on the subject. Now just what was it that Google isn't doing?
--
»www.lp.org/issues/family-budget.shtml
"That government is best which governs least" - Thoreau |
|
wannab3
Premium
join:2001-08-09
Whitehall, PA | reply to Richard B
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
HA |
|
