| How is this possibe with no upstream bonding modems? Does any company actually have upstream bonding capable modems yet? The ones motorola released only are downstream bonding capable. |
|
| Upstream channel bonding pre-cert DOCSIS 3.0 gear should arrive this year... |
|
|
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | At 120 megabit bonded upstream capacity per node, their efforts to keep people from using 50 up are going to get very interesting. No wonder they stuff FCC hearings full of drones.
I wonder how many of their systems have had channels 2-6 eliminated already in preparation for the additional upstream bandwidth (42-88 MHz) required, or had all of the taps and diplexers replaced.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
 extreme50Formerly TwoKDialupPremium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI | said by RadioDoc:At 120 megabit bonded upstream capacity per node, their efforts to keep people from using 50 up are going to get very interesting. No wonder they stuff FCC hearings full of drones. Can't say that I blame them. They had to keep the fact-twisting paid telco shills out.
Anyway, I'll bet a tool point to a donut that I'll have 50/50 Comcast HSI looooooonnnnnnnng before PewVerse is available.
--
Comcast has spoiled me rotten! |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Hey, you made it back from the hearing in one piece! I was worried about you and the snowstorm.
Did they give you some new trolling points yet or are you still using the tired old stuff?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
extreme50Formerly TwoKDialupPremium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI | said by RadioDoc:Hey, you made it back from the hearing in one piece! I was worried about you and the snowstorm. Thanks for your concern but traveling thru snowstorms to attend a hearing is so '90s. With Comcast HSI, I could easily videoconference if I had to. Matter of fact, I could videoconference AND watch 30 separate HDTV channels AND use digital voice.
Pretty amazing considering I'm right in the middle of one of T's many broadband ghettos.
--
Comcast has spoiled me rotten! |
|
 imrfPremium
join:2002-06-06
Utica, MI | reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc:At 120 megabit bonded upstream capacity per node, Again, the node isn't the bottleneck. A node is a transparent object in the network. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| reply to extreme50
said by extreme50:said by RadioDoc:Hey, you made it back from the hearing in one piece! I was worried about you and the snowstorm. Thanks for your concern but traveling thru snowstorms to attend a hearing is so '90s. With Comcast HSI, I could easily videoconference if I had to. Matter of fact, I could videoconference AND watch 30 separate HDTV channels AND use digital voice. Pretty amazing considering I'm right in the middle of one of T's many broadband ghettos. I thought I saw you asleep at the meeting at Harvard? |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to imrf
You know exactly what I meant.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
| reply to extreme50
Why not make it interesting. If U-verse hits your location before 50-50 from Comcast then promise you'll drop Comcast for AT&T. It should be a perfectly safe bet by your faith. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to extreme50
said by extreme50:With Comcast HSI, I could easily videoconference if I had to. Matter of fact, I could videoconference AND watch 30 separate HDTV channels AND use digital voice. Pretty amazing considering I'm right in the middle of one of T's many broadband ghettos. Still using the same tired old stuff, I see.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to imrf
said by imrf:said by RadioDoc:At 120 megabit bonded upstream capacity per node, Again, the node isn't the bottleneck. A node is a transparent object in the network. tell that to us on loaded nodes that aren't getting what we're paying for.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
extreme50Formerly TwoKDialupPremium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI | reply to bogey780
said by bogey780:Why not make it interesting. If U-verse hits your location before 50-50 from Comcast then promise you'll drop Comcast for AT&T. It should be a perfectly safe bet by your faith. No matter how slim the chances, giving up Comcast is not a risk I'm willing to take.
How about a friendly avatar wager? If I win, you have to post using my Slowsky DSL avatar once a day, front page, for a month. If I lose, I'll post using the avatar of your choice. Deal? 
--
Comcast has spoiled me rotten! |
|
imrfPremium
join:2002-06-06
Utica, MI | reply to dvd536
said by dvd536:tell that to us on loaded nodes that aren't getting what we're paying for. Again, a node isn't the problem, the CMTS line card is the issue. All that the cable company needs to do is add more line cards and move nodes around, and your bandwidth will improve. But as I've said before, the node is a transparent object in the network. All a node does is convert light to RF and RF to light, nothing else. It has no choking point. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
| reply to extreme50
You employees are so cute with your brand loyalty! 
I think maybe I should post a front page story where you both espouse the value of your respective networks? Kind of a verbal techno-battle to the death? |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to imrf
Actually that's even worse. If it is so easy that even a cable company can do it, why are there capacity issues at all?
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
