<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Just the beginging in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20076668</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:48:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:48:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  flycuban <A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I guess each "Region" has there own peering sites, because here in Florida most if not all the traffic goes thru at&t.. Hardly none of the traffic goes on the Comcast national backbone...  <br> </div>Indeed. However, isn't Florida one of the regions Comcast picked up from Road Runner? Perhaps Comcast hasn't, yet, built out their backbone in the Southeastern U.S.?<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>02/29/08 02:36:56 Slow traceroute vcodsk0039&#012;Trace v*******39 (67.171.***.***) ...&#012;192.168.102.1   RTT:   1ms TTL:170 (chihiro.aosake.net ok)&#012;192.168.0.1     RTT:   2ms TTL:170 (suzuka.aosake.net ok)&#012;68.127.139.254  RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (adsl-68-127-139-254.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ok)&#012;76.246.22.2     RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.93.239  RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.190.14  RTT:  12ms TTL:170 (bb2-p3-0.sgnwmi.ameritech.net ok)&#012;64.215.195.241  RTT:  12ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;67.17.107.33    RTT:  13ms TTL:170 (ge2-2-10G.ar1.SNV2.gblx.net ok)&#012;68.86.85.78     RTT:  14ms TTL:170 (pos-0-7-0-0-cr01.sanjose.ca.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.85.197    RTT:  18ms TTL:170 (pos-0-6-0-0-cr01.sacramento.ca.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.85.206    RTT:  33ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;68.86.90.233    RTT:  33ms TTL:170 (te-0-4-0-4-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.90.234    RTT:  34ms TTL:170 (te-5-1-ar01.troutdale.or.bverton.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.216.125   RTT:  39ms TTL:170 (te-9-3-ur02.eugene.or.bverton.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.216.65    RTT:  38ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur01.eugene.or.bverton.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.216.113   RTT:  39ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur01.corvallis.or.bverton.comcast.net ok)&#012;* * * failed&#012;67.171.***.***  RTT:  48ms TTL: 47 (v*******39.hsd1.or.comcast.net ok)&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->One Global Crossing (Tier 1 backbone provider) hop between ATTIS (my provider's backbone) and Comcast's 'ibone' network.<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>02/29/08 02:32:09 Slow traceroute 68.87.196.233&#012;Trace 68.87.196.233 ...&#012;192.168.102.1   RTT:   1ms TTL:170 (chihiro.aosake.net ok)&#012;192.168.0.1     RTT:   2ms TTL:170 (suzuka.aosake.net ok)&#012;68.127.139.254  RTT:  10ms TTL:170 (adsl-68-127-139-254.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ok)&#012;64.164.107.1    RTT:  10ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.93.229  RTT:  10ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;69.220.8.41     RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.251.246 RTT:  12ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;4.68.18.206     RTT:  13ms TTL:170 (ae-4-99.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net ok)&#012;68.86.90.157    RTT:  12ms TTL:170 (te-0-4-0-1-cr01.sanjose.ca.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.192.93    RTT:  14ms TTL:170 (te-0-2-0-1-ar01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.192.94    RTT:  15ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur01.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.192.98    RTT:  15ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur03.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.87.196.233   RTT:  18ms TTL:242 (ge-2-22-ur02.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net ok)&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->One Level 3 (Tier 1 backbone provider) hop between ATTIS (my provider's backbone) and Comcast's 'ibone' network.<br><br>All connections to West Coast destinations are made right here in San Jos&eacute;, California.<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>02/29/08 02:44:56 Slow traceroute 69.249.89.126&#012;Trace 69.249.89.126 ...&#012;192.168.102.1   RTT:   1ms TTL:170 (chihiro.aosake.net ok)&#012;192.168.0.1     RTT:   2ms TTL:170 (suzuka.aosake.net ok)&#012;68.127.139.254  RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (adsl-68-127-139-254.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ok)&#012;76.246.22.129   RTT:  10ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.93.239  RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;151.164.94.47   RTT:  11ms TTL:170 (ex2-p12-0.eqsjca.sbcglobal.net ok)&#012;151.164.251.246 RTT:  12ms TTL:170 (No rDNS)&#012;4.68.18.254     RTT:  19ms TTL:170 (vlan99.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.69.134.221    RTT:  13ms TTL:170 (ae-92-92.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.69.132.58     RTT:  62ms TTL:170 (ae-3.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.69.132.38     RTT:  57ms TTL:170 (ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.69.132.62     RTT:  70ms TTL:170 (ae-3.ebr3.Chicago1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.69.134.61     RTT:  65ms TTL:170 (ae-78.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net ok)&#012;4.68.101.115    RTT:  62ms TTL:170 (ae-2-54.edge1.Chicago2.Level3.net ok)&#012;68.86.85.102    RTT:  63ms TTL:170 (pos-0-15-0-0-cr01.chicago.il.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.90.29     RTT:  92ms TTL:170 (pos-0-5-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.209.202   RTT:  95ms TTL:170 (te-0-1-0-2-crs01.plainfield.nj.panjde.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.209.201   RTT:  90ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur02.plainfield.nj.panjde.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.209.197   RTT:  90ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur01.plainfield.nj.panjde.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.209.193   RTT:  91ms TTL:170 (te-9-1-ur02.summit.nj.panjde.comcast.net ok)&#012;68.86.219.229   RTT:  92ms TTL:170 (ge-5-1-ur01.summit.nj.panjde.comcast.net ok)&#012;* * * failed&#012;* * * failed&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->Seven Level 3 (Tier 1 backbone) hops between ATTIS in San Jos&eacute;, California and the Comcast 'ibone' network in Chicago, Illinois.<br><br>I would guess that Comcast just has to put in their 'ibone' in the Southeast, based on trace routes to '.hsd1.ga.comcast.net' and '.hsd1.fl.comcast.net' from the West Coast.<br><br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082238</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:50:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : The AT&T loop price hike is for their last mile service in the 13-state legacy SBC region. It should only affect DSL prices related to the DSLAM and ATM networks for at&t Yahoo! HSI subscribers. There should be no impact on the ILEC DSL prices in AT&T Southeast (the former Bellsouth FastAccess, which is now called, "AT&T FastAccess), or the reselling of CLEC services outside of the AT&T ILEC footprint (AT&T Worldnet DSL Service, which resells Covad connections; and their prices are controlled by the regional ILECs serving Covad). Nor should it directly impact the AT&T Tier 1 backbone (AT&T Worldnet Services, or ATTW), which provides transit to Comcast in Florida.<br><br>Do remember, before AT&T bought Bellsouth, SBC bought AT&T. The only thing SBC changed was the name of the company; management is still the same as it was under SBC.<br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082211</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:18:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : Mark the difference between AT&T Internet Services (ATTIS), which provides your network connections to other transit services, and AT&T Worldnet Services (ATTW), which is the Tier 1 backbone transit provider offering services comparable to Level 3, Qwest, and Verizon (Business); all of which are also Tier 1 networks.<br><br>ATTIS will only connect with ATTW when routing tables call for it.<br><br>You, as an at&t Yahoo! HSI customer, will be on the ATTIS network until it connects with a destination transit provider, as announced in BGP by the destination.<br><br>P.S. I forgot to mention that ATTIS will connect directly to Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! networks, without going through any other transit. At least for all trace routes I have ever run to them.<br><br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20082200</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:10:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20081546</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1519555"><b>Doug135</b></A> : i've got AT&T and i trace routed 209.191.93.52 and i got:<br><br>1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  <br>2   264 ms   274 ms   202 ms  ppp-70-244-249-254.dsl.snantx.swbell.net [70.244.249.254]<br>  <br>3   151 ms    72 ms   127 ms dist2-vlan60.snantx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.17.163]<br><br>4   407 ms   155 ms    98 ms  bb1-g9-3-0.snantx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.17.246]<br><br>5   385 ms   564 ms     *     151.164.95.188<br>  <br>6   427 ms   496 ms   397 ms  asn10310-11-yahoo.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.250.202]<br>  <br>7   499 ms   334 ms   297 ms  ge-0-1-0-p110.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.101]<br>  <br>8   147 ms   435 ms   252 ms  te-9-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.9]<br>  <br>9   301 ms   349 ms   432 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br>i tried 68.86.220.145 and it switches from sbc servers to level3 servers and then to the comcast servers. i take it as  at&t peers with others as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20081546</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:36:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078366</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/601976"><b>SoilFlames</b></A> : Does comcast really own their own lines from SF to NJ??  <br><br>I have no idea.  But I would assume the fiber along the way is owned by someone else.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078366</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : I'm not doubting that.<br>Nearly all of Comcast traffic here used to go through AT&T a couple years ago. <br>Not anymore!<br>For some routes, sure! AT&T, Gblx, Level3...<br>For *most* things, here in my part of the State, it stays on Comcast across the country.<br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078277</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078196</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><b>flycuban</b></A> : I guess each "Region" has there own peering sites, because here in Florida most if not all the traffic goes thru at&t.. Hardly none of the traffic goes on the Comcast national backbone...  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078196</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:58:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Similarly, DSL-Extreme uses multiple, including Level3<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20078106</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:46:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <br>You stated that "Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider..."<br>I showed you that in most cases, they do not - at least from here in California.<br><br>For that Yahoo address you used: 209.191.93.52...<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Tracing route to f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com &#91;209.191.93.52&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.0.1&#012;  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#012;  3    14 ms     7 ms     *     ge-2-22-ur02.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.&#012;96.233&#93;&#012;  4     8 ms     *        8 ms  te-8-1-ur03.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.1&#012;2.101&#93;&#012;  5     7 ms     6 ms    16 ms  te-8-1-ur01.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.1&#012;2.97&#93;&#012;  6    10 ms     8 ms    10 ms  te-0-7-0-1-ar01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68&#012;86.90.158&#93;&#012;  7    12 ms    11 ms    10 ms  COMCAST-IP.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net &#91;4.71.118.&#012;4&#93;&#012;  8    11 ms     9 ms     9 ms  xe-8-3-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net &#91;4.71.118.13&#012; &#012;  9    12 ms    10 ms    12 ms  ae-43-99.car3.SanJose1.Level3.net &#91;4.68.18.197&#93;&#012; &#012; 10    11 ms    12 ms    11 ms  4.71.112.14&#012; 11    58 ms    56 ms    55 ms  so-0-0-0.pat2.dcp.yahoo.com &#91;216.115.101.150&#93;&#012; 12    57 ms    57 ms    65 ms  ge-1-1-0-p131.msr2.mud.yahoo.com &#91;216.115.104.9&#012;&#93;&#012; 13    56 ms    59 ms    58 ms  te-8-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com &#91;68.142.193.7&#93;&#012; 14    56 ms    57 ms    57 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com &#91;209.191.93.52&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012; &#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>No AT&T here - I see Level3.<br>Comcast will peer with whomever is closest if needed.<br>Not just AT&T.<br>For most national backbone tasks, Comcast will use their own - for many of us!<br><br>YMMV<br><br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077970</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:20:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077844</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  flycuban <A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>.. This was supposed to lower prices? ....<br> </div>you know who thought the merger would lower prices?<br><br><b>NOBODY!</b><br><br>they figured if they said it people would believe it. turns out the regulators (or deregulators) didn't care whether it would raise prices or not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077844</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:00:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077426</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><b>flycuban</b></A> : NOT FROM MIAMI - Almost all of our traffic is on at&t bro.<br><br>Tracing route to msnbc.com [207.46.245.61]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1     4 ms    16 ms     7 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  3   103 ms     7 ms     *     ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8<br>5.229.57]<br>  4    11 ms    12 ms     9 ms  te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.165.37]<br>  5    10 ms     *       10 ms  po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.164.13]<br>  6    19 ms    24 ms    20 ms  12.116.114.13<br>  7   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6]<br>  8   107 ms   108 ms   107 ms  cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.1]<br>  9   101 ms    99 ms   105 ms  cr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.31.29]<br> 10   101 ms   101 ms   100 ms  tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.17.14]<br> 11   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  tbr2.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.122.10.197]<br> 12   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.134]<br> 13    99 ms    98 ms   101 ms  cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.17.201]<br> 14   106 ms   100 ms   100 ms  cr1.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.31.162]<br> 15   104 ms    99 ms   100 ms  tbr1.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.23.130]<br> 16   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  12.127.6.33<br> 17    91 ms    92 ms    91 ms  12.124.173.42<br> 18    92 ms    97 ms    91 ms  ge-5-3-0-56.tuk-64cb-1a.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.44.<br>1]<br> 19   102 ms    91 ms    91 ms  ten2-1.tuk-76c-1b.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.36.201]<br><br>-------------------------------------------------<br><br>Tracing route to www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  3     9 ms     9 ms     *     ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8<br>5.229.57]<br>  4     9 ms    10 ms     *     te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.165.37]<br>  5    11 ms     *        *     po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.164.13]<br>  6    18 ms    18 ms    19 ms  12.116.114.13<br>  7    52 ms    51 ms    50 ms  tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6]<br>  8    50 ms    51 ms    51 ms  cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.17]<br>  9    52 ms    51 ms    50 ms  cr1.hs1tx.ip.att.net [12.122.31.241]<br> 10    50 ms    50 ms    50 ms  cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.5.233]<br> 11    52 ms    50 ms    51 ms  tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.18.206]<br> 12    51 ms    49 ms    50 ms  gar8.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.100.81]<br> 13    53 ms    52 ms    52 ms  12.86.20.18<br> 14   107 ms    54 ms    54 ms  ge-0-1-0-p110.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.10<br>1]<br> 15    54 ms    52 ms    51 ms  te-8-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.7]<br> 16    57 ms    53 ms    52 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>-------------------------------------------------<br>Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]<br>(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.<br><br>C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.cnn.com<br><br>Tracing route to www.cnn.com [64.236.16.20]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    20 ms     2 ms     5 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  3    60 ms   199 ms   199 ms  ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8<br>5.229.57]<br>  4     9 ms     9 ms     *     te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.165.37]<br>  5    10 ms     *       11 ms  po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6<br>8.86.164.13]<br>  6    18 ms    18 ms    19 ms  12.116.114.13<br>  7    28 ms    27 ms    28 ms  tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6]<br>  8    28 ms    28 ms    26 ms  cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.9]<br>  9    27 ms    28 ms    28 ms  cr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.31.29]<br> 10    28 ms    28 ms    28 ms  tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.17.6]<br> 11    27 ms    26 ms    26 ms  ggr3.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.96.9]<br> 12    27 ms    26 ms    25 ms  br1-a340s7.wswdc.ip.att.net [192.205.34.162]<br> 13    26 ms    26 ms    26 ms  bb1-atm-P4-0.atdn.net [66.185.147.208]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20077426</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:02:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076968</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  flycuban <A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>99.999% of there peer goes to at&t... Just funny that they use there competitor for there main transit peering...They complain about at&t, but they use them on the back end. You would think they would use level 3 or some other company and not use at&t at all. Go Figure!<br> </div>They do it the same reason why my company uses it. When you request multiple pops from them it is much cheaper to get connections out all over the place. Main issue is when they upgrade core routers and they take a dive , it brings down the whole network.<br><br>AT&T is just cheaper if you want diverse pops. I wish Verizon would do something to lower their diverse pop prices. I hate seeing my work traffic all going over at&t , I want to see diversity.<br><small>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076968</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:59:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  flycuban <A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider....<br> </div>Ok... <br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Tracing route to ge-2-4-ur01.union.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.86.220.145&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.0.1&#012;  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#012;  3     8 ms     9 ms     *     ge-2-22-ur02.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.1&#012;96.233&#93;&#012;  4     8 ms     6 ms     *     te-8-1-ur03.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.19&#012;2.101&#93;&#012;  5     8 ms     *        7 ms  te-8-1-ur01.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.19&#012;2.97&#93;&#012;  6     8 ms     9 ms     9 ms  te-0-5-0-4-ar01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.72.86&#93;&#012;  7    10 ms    12 ms    11 ms  te-4-1-cr01.sanjose.ca.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.86.&#012;72.85&#93;&#012;  8    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms  te-1-1-cr01.losangeles.ca.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.68.74&#93;&#012;  9    39 ms    38 ms    37 ms  te-1-1-cr01.santateresa.tx.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68&#012;.86.68.82&#93;&#012; 10    47 ms    47 ms    47 ms  te-9-3-cr01.stratford.tx.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.8&#012;6.68.90&#93;&#012; 11    57 ms    57 ms    57 ms  te-1-1-cr01.dallas.tx.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.86.6&#012;8.94&#93;&#012; 12    72 ms    71 ms    71 ms  te-1-1-cr01.nashville.tn.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.8&#012;6.68.98&#93;&#012; 13    78 ms    79 ms    76 ms  te-1-1-cr01.atlanta.ga.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.86.&#012;68.102&#93;&#012; 14    84 ms    83 ms    86 ms  te-1-1-cr01.charlotte.nc.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.8&#012;6.68.106&#93;&#012; 15    90 ms    89 ms    90 ms  te-1-1-cr01.richmond.va.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.86&#012;.68.110&#93;&#012; 16    94 ms    93 ms    93 ms  te-1-1-cr01.mclean.va.cbone.comcast.net &#91;68.86.6&#012;8.114&#93;&#012; 17   100 ms    98 ms    98 ms  te-1-1-cr01.philadelphia.pa.cbone.comcast.net &#91;6&#012;8.86.68.2&#93;&#012; 18    99 ms   100 ms   101 ms  be-40-crs01.401nbroadst.pa.panjde.comcast.net &#91;6&#012;8.86.208.33&#93;&#012; 19   101 ms   101 ms   101 ms  be-50-crs01.ivyland.pa.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.86&#012;.208.14&#93;&#012; 20   103 ms   102 ms   103 ms  po-10-ar01.verona.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.86.2&#012;08.13&#93;&#012; 21   104 ms   105 ms   105 ms  po-90-ur02.narlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.209.253&#93;&#012; 22   103 ms   103 ms   102 ms  po-90-ur01.narlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.158.177&#93;&#012; 23   104 ms   105 ms   105 ms  68.86.209.249&#012; 24   103 ms   103 ms   104 ms  po-90-ur01.jerseycity.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.209.245&#93;&#012; 25   104 ms   105 ms   105 ms  po-90-ur02.union.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.86.20&#012;9.241&#93;&#012; 26   103 ms   105 ms   102 ms  ge-2-4-ur01.union.nj.panjde.comcast.net &#91;68.86.2&#012;20.145&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012; &#012;C:\Documents and Settings\David Adkins&gt;tracert www.dslreports.com&#012; &#012;Tracing route to dslreports.com &#91;209.123.109.175&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.0.1&#012;  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#012;  3     8 ms     *        8 ms  ge-2-22-ur02.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.1&#012;96.233&#93;&#012;  4    22 ms    17 ms     *     te-8-1-ur03.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.19&#012;2.101&#93;&#012;  5     7 ms     *        8 ms  te-8-1-ur01.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.19&#012;2.97&#93;&#012;  6    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  pos-0-7-0-0-ar01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68&#012;.86.90.154&#93;&#012;  7    12 ms    11 ms    12 ms  pos-0-9-0-0-cr01.sanjose.ca.ibone.comcast.net &#91;6&#012;8.86.85.130&#93;&#012;  8    69 ms    57 ms    57 ms  pos-0-9-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net &#91;68&#012;.86.85.118&#93;&#012;  9    83 ms    84 ms    84 ms  pos-0-6-0-0-cr01.chicago.il.ibone.comcast.net &#91;6&#012;8.86.85.50&#93;&#012; 10    92 ms    93 ms    93 ms  pos-0-3-0-0-cr01.cleveland.oh.ibone.comcast.net&#012;&#91;68.86.85.37&#93;&#012; 11    96 ms    97 ms    94 ms  pos-0-7-0-0-cr01.pittsburgh.pa.ibone.comcast.net&#012; &#91;68.86.85.46&#93;&#012; 12   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  te-0-3-0-5-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net &#91;68.&#012;86.84.153&#93;&#012; 13   100 ms   100 ms   100 ms  te-1-3-pr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net &#91;68.86.&#012;84.154&#93;&#012; 14   102 ms   103 ms   100 ms  xe-3-1-0.was11.ip.tiscali.net &#91;213.200.84.117&#93;&#012; 15   122 ms   106 ms   107 ms  so-1-0-0.nyc22.ip.tiscali.net &#91;213.200.80.125&#93;&#012; 16    94 ms    94 ms    97 ms  netaccess-gw.ip.tiscali.net &#91;213.200.73.122&#93;&#012; 17    95 ms    95 ms    96 ms  0.e1-4.tbr2.mmu.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.77&#93;&#012; 18    96 ms    98 ms    95 ms  0.e-1-3.tbr1.mmu.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.25&#93;&#012; 19    96 ms    95 ms    96 ms  0.e-1-1.tbr1.oct.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.17&#93;&#012; 20    94 ms    95 ms    95 ms  0.ge-1-2-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net &#91;209.123.10.58&#93;&#012; 21   166 ms    95 ms     *     www.dslreports.com &#91;209.123.109.175&#93;&#012; 22   868 ms     *       97 ms  www.dslreports.com &#91;209.123.109.175&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>Me to N.J. then me to DSLReports.<br>To N.J - all Comcast<br><br>I see Comcast all the way from here(S.F. Bay Area, California) to Ashburn, Virginia, then Tiscali to NAC.net for DSLReports<br><br>Yes, on occasion Comcast does peer with AT&T for some things, but Comcast does have Nation Wide backbone itself. <br>Look for cbone and ibone. <br><br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076884</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:47:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076705</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><b>flycuban</b></A> : 99.999% of there peer goes to at&t... Just funny that they use there competitor for there main transit peering...They complain about at&t, but they use them on the back end. You would think they would use level 3 or some other company and not use at&t at all. Go Figure!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076705</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:22:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076668</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  flycuban <A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I see no point in this merger with Bellsouth, Cingular, SBC. This was supposed to lower prices? And now that at&t is in the position to do whatever they want - the smaller ISP's that use at&t for wholesale DSL service are really going to get screwed.  <br><b><br>What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider....</b><br> </div>Actually, Comcast doesn't - ANYMORE. They built their own fiber backbone and mostly just peer to AT&T like they do with many other backbone providers.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076668</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:14:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just the beginging</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1194597"><b>flycuban</b></A> : I see no point in this merger with Bellsouth, Cingular, SBC. This was supposed to lower prices? And now that at&t is in the position to do whatever they want - the smaller ISP's that use at&t for wholesale DSL service are really going to get screwed.  <br><br>What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20076652</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:10:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
