 woody7Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA | to answer your question "You're on the edge of what I think is a more important issue. What if a disgruntled employee fabricates information, posts it to an "anonymous" site like this and defames his former employer. What's the avenue of recourse?
As I said earlier, I don't agree with the way it was done, I only really commented on how it was done (the judges part). On a side note, if what was posted was/is illegal,then to me there is no problem, IE"pentagon papers". The company has rights, that I don't disagree with, but as I researched what had happened, is that a lot of what they wanted stifled was being done behind the scenes. The correct avenue would have been to complain to the Cayman authorities,file a complaint with them, which I understand didn't happen. To me the whole gist of what they tried to do was keep it from seeing the light of day and to that end they seemed to have shot themselves in the foot. To answer your question there are proper avenues for them to use.Peace
--
BlooMe |
