reply to woody7
Re: Public Citizen overlooks court jurisdiction over the host
said by woody7:They display the materials as originating from the bank(!).
Just because someone "asserts" something, doesn't it have to be proven/disproven?
said by woody7:I think the issue is that the bank claimed the web site was unresponsive to requests to remedy the matter outside of court.
Other than hosting child pornography I thought that you couldn't hold the hosting company libel?
Some will say "but they didn't identify who they were, or what they wanted." I read the email exchange and all I see is wikileaks playing a cat-and-mouse game. The end result is that that they should have put the bank's attorney in touch with an attorney (any attorney).
Did you all read the latest news from the judge?