<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>All this negativity... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20084629</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:14:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:14:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: All this negativity...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20087882</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Jerm <A HREF="/useremail/u/150929"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>For better (in my mind) or worse, PowerBoost doesn't exist (yet) with Charter.  This is actually okay with me because it won't throw off speed tests or allow them <i>any</i> excuse not to give me full bandwidth.  In my opinion, PB becomes a detriment in heavily loaded areas because even though the "peak" speed may seem acceptable (on speed tests) the actual sustained performance can be much less.</div>If you're on a oversubscribed node, powerboost doesn't activate. I know because im on a loaded node and have very seldomly gotten PB to activate.<br><small>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20087882</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:54:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>All this negativity...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20084629</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/150929"><b>Jerm</b></A> : I admit, I like bashing on Charter too sometimes.  The past performance in my area was pretty sub-par in years past, but in recent times they have really gotten their act together.<br><br>What is different about Charter vs Comcast?  Well I for one actually think Charter may be BETTER than Comcast!  Oh noes - that statement totally goes against BBR rulahs!!! omgwtfbbq1@#$!@#$<br><br>REASONS WHY CHARTER IS BETTER THAN COMCAST:<br><br>A.  They do not throttle/block/reset or in any way inhibit torrents.<br><br>B.  NO CAPS!<br><br>C.  For better (in my mind) or worse, PowerBoost doesn't exist (yet) with Charter.  This is actually okay with me because it won't throw off speed tests or allow them <i>any</i> excuse not to give me full bandwidth.  In my opinion, PB becomes a detriment in heavily loaded areas because even though the "peak" speed may seem acceptable (on speed tests) the actual sustained performance can be much less.  PB is just a trick to allow them to oversell their nodes more.  Now if you're in a Comcast customer in a lightly loaded area, PB can be a blessing - but in the loaded down area it just masks the true poor performance.<br><br>D.  (and this one applies to me, but no all Charter areas) I get my full 10/1 connnection 24/7/365 with LOW latency that rarely fluctuates more than 1-2ms.  <br><br>----------<br><br>If Charter can keep up with the "hands off" approach to throttling & caps, then Charter *may* atually end up having the best DOCSIS3 out there!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20084629</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:31:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
