Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Former FCC Boss On Comcast Traffic Shaping » uhh wtf mate!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Not so fast »
« "If we had 100 Mb/s..."  
AuthorAll Replies


Jerm

join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA


1 edit
reply to Skippy25
Re: uhh wtf mate!

said by Skippy25 See Profile :

Every customer wouldn't upload at that speed and for the most part those that do will not do it for an extended amount of time ... I have 100mb to the desktop. If there is network slow down I put a sniffer on it and find the user that is "abusing" it. That individual is dealt with and if they don't adhere to my "advice" I get their performance manager involved.
Skippy - Your model works great if P2P didn't exist. What you are talking about of course is a network you manage at work. A consumer grade network is a *very different* beast and it should NOT have admins telling customers what they can/can't do on the network. Network neutrality.

Think about your upstream provider - say your business *wanted* to use your 100mbps upload 24/7 to host a legal bittorrent file your business created. Should your ISP cut you off and tell you NO?

P2P (ie bittorrent) can fill 100mbps up on a popular file if it is configured in a fashion to do so.

Comcast currently uses their sandvine application to do essentially what you describe, but on an automatic basis. Thus transfer caps and throttling again rear their ugly head.

BT is an amazing protocol, because for the very first time users - even (and perhaps especially) uneducated ones - can do exactly exactly what you state they won't: "upload at that speed (100mbps) ... for an extended amount of time"

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS

You damage the network neutrality argument.

ISP's can ABSOLUTELY manage their network by limiting heavy users. A consumer grade network should be no different. If anything, if Comcast can't manage their network properly, maybe they do have too much market share, and SHOULD be limited.

If a Business wants to upload 24/7 they get a business account, and no problem.

Network neutrality is about treating every protocol the same, from every provider.

Sandvine doesn't do at all what he says, it completely disables a portion of protocol, weather it be abusive or not.
Forums » Former FCC Boss On Comcast Traffic ShapingNot so fast »
« "If we had 100 Mb/s..."  


Thursday, 26-Nov 16:22:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [106] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [69] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [59] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [39] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [34] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Rogers Rocket Stick [Rogers]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· No Newegg connection [General Questions]